논문 상세보기

Present Status and Prospect of Valuation for Tangible Fixed Asset in South Korea KCI 등재

유형고정자산 가치평가 현황: 우리나라 사례를 중심으로

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/420451
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,600원
한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering)
초록

The records system is believed to have started in Italy in the 14th century in line with trade developments in Europe. In 1491, Luca Pacioli, a mathematician, and an Italian Franciscan monk wrote the first book that described double-entry accounting processes. In many countries, including Korea, the government accounting standards used single-entry bookkeeping rather than double-entry bookkeeping that can be aggregated by account subject. The cash-based and single-entry bookkeeping used by the government in the past had limitations in providing clear information on financial status and establishing a performance-oriented financial management system. Accordingly, the National Accounting Act (promulgated in October 2007) stipulated the introduction of double-entry bookkeeping and accrual accounting systems in the government sector from January 1, 2009. Furthermore, the Korean government has also introduced International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and the System of National Accounts (SNA). Since 2014, Korea owned five national accounts. In Korea, valuation began with the 1968 National Wealth Statistics Survey. The academic origins of the valuation of national wealth statistics which had been investigated by due diligence every 10 years since 1968 are based on the 'Engineering Valuation' of professor Marston in the Department of Industrial Engineering at Iowa State University in the 1930s. This field has spread to economics, etc. In economics, it became the basis of capital stock estimation for positive economics such as econometrics. The valuation by the National Wealth Statistics Survey contributed greatly to converting the book value of accounting data into vintage data. And in 2000 National Statistical Office collected actual disposal data for the 1-digit asset class and obtained the ASL(average service life) by Iowa curve. Then, with the data on fixed capital formation centered on the National B/S Team of the Bank of Korea, the national wealth statistics were prepared by the Permanent Inventory Method(PIM). The asset classification was also classified into 59 types, including 2 types of residential buildings, 4 types of non-residential buildings, 14 types of structures, 9 types of transportation equipment, 28 types of machinery, and 2 types of intangible fixed assets. Tables of useful lives of tangible fixed assets published by the Korea Appraisal Board in 1999 and 2013 were made by the Iowa curve method. In Korea, the Iowa curve method has been adopted as a method of ASL estimation. There are three types of the Iowa curve method. The retirement rate method of the three types is the best because it is based on the collection and compilation of the data of all properties in service during a period of recent years, both properties retired and that are still in service. We hope the retirement rate method instead of the individual unit method is used in the estimation of ASL. Recently Korean government’s accounting system has been developed. When revenue expenditure and capital expenditure were mixed in the past single-entry bookkeeping we would like to suggest that BOK and National Statistical Office have accumulated knowledge of a rational difference between revenue expenditure and capital expenditure. In particular, it is important when it is estimated capital stock by PIM. Korea also needs an empirical study on economic depreciation like Hulten & Wykoff Catalog A of the US BEA.

목차
1. 서 론: 부기와 가치평가
    1.1 가치평가, 가치평가공학 및 부기
    1.2 가치평가 주요항목
    1.3 가치평가의 현재 수준
2. 유형고정자산 내용연수 추정에 관한 이론
    2.1 내용연수(Service Life) 개요
    2.2 내용연수(Service Life) 추정
    2.3 내용연수(Service Life) 추정 이론
    2.4 내용연수(Service Life)의 변화
    2.5 경제적 내용연수 측정의 현황 및 발전방향
3. 정부회계의 늦은 진보에서 오는 오류-자본적/수익적 지출의 구분 오류 사례
4. 가치평가의 향후 과제
    4.1 국부통계조사
    4.2 1997~2006 국부통계(통계청 2008년 간행)
    4.3 PIM(영구재고법)
    4.4 유형고정자산 내용연수표
    4.5 향후과제
5. 결 론
Acknowledgement
References
저자
  • Jin-Hyung Cho(School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) | 조진형 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부)
  • Hyun-Seung Oh(Department of IME, Hannam University) | 오현승 (한남대학교 산업경영학과)
  • Sae-Jae Lee(School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) | 이세재 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부) Corresponding Author