논문 상세보기
pp.91-98
PURPOSES : This study aims to suggest how to utilize "standby data" of shared mobility that does not contain personal information and examine whether "standby data" can derive existing shared mobility operation analysis items similarly.
METHODS : An existing Personal Mobility (PM) traffic pattern analysis was performed by identifying the user (User ID) and the user's route in a time frame. In this study, the PM traffic pattern analysis focuses on a vehicle (ID of the standby vehicle) and its standby location. We examined whether the items derived from the User ID-based traffic pattern analysis could also be derived from the standby Vehicle ID-based analysis.
RESULTS : The analysis showed that all five items (traffic volume by time slot, peak time, average travel time, average travel distance, and average travel speed) of the existing User ID-based PM travel analysis result could be derived similarly using the standby Vehicle ID-based PM traffic analysis. However, the disadvantage is that the average driving distance is calculated as a straight-line distance. It seems possible to overcome this limitation by correcting the average driving distance through linkage analysis with road network data. However, it is not possible to derive the instantaneous maximum speed or acceleration/deceleration.
CONCLUSIONS : In an era in which various means of transportation are being introduced, data sharing is not preferred because of legal issues.Consequently, it is difficult to understand the use of new means of transportation and formulate new policies. To address this, data sharing can be active based on standby data that is not related to personal information.
1. 서론
2. 관련제도 및 선행연구 검토
2.1. 관련 법·제도 검토
2.2. 공유형 PM 데이터 분석 관련 선행연구 검토
3. 활용 데이터 개요 및 특성
3.1. 모빌리티(PM)데이터 통합 개념
3.2. 표준 PM데이터(안)
3.3. 기존 PM데이터와의 차별성
4. PM 통합데이터의 정보보호 문제 검토
4.1. 개인정보보호법 측면
4.2. 위치정보법 측면
4.3. 신용정보법 측면
4.4. 정보보호 관련법 검토 시사점
5. PM 대기데이터 활용 분석
5.1. 기존 PM데이터 분석 항목
5.2. PM 대기데이터 분석
5.3. 기존 PM데이터 분석과 비교 결과
6. 결론
REFERENCES
