논문 상세보기

“谢谢”隐性否定用法的功能与机制 KCI 등재

  • 언어CHI
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/423167
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 5,200원
中國學 (중국학)
대한중국학회 (Korean Association For Chinese Studies)
초록

在网络社交媒体等场合有些具有积极含义的词语会衍生出一种表达负面情绪或评价的 用法,如本文的研究对象“谢谢”。本文认为,这种新型用法属于隐性否定,本质上是为 凸显说话人主观感受并达到某种间接言语行为而使用的虚假礼貌策略。本文基于语料对符 合该类特征的“谢谢”的结构特征,即组配要件和位置分布进行了分析,并探讨了其语用 功能以及演化机制。从言语行为的角度归纳了该类“谢谢”的语用功能,大致可以确立为 三类:“隐约其辞,弦外有音”示意功能、“正话反说,暗箭伤人”宣泄功能、“超乎象 外,得其环中”调侃功能。其产生这种负面情绪或评价的演化机制是虚假礼貌策略及交际 主观性。

In networking, social media and other occasions, some words with positive meanings will derive from the expression of negative emotions or evaluation. “Xiexie” has developed a use to express negative emotions or comments in social media and other contexts. This paper holds that this new usage belongs to implicit negation, which is essentially a false politeness strategy used to highlight the speaker’s subjective feelings and achieve some indirect speech act. Based on the corpus, this paper analyzes the structural characteristics of “xiexie”, and discusses its pragmatic function and evolutionary mechanism. From the perspective of speech act, this paper summarizes the pragmatic functions of this kind of “xiexie”, which can be roughly established into three categories: signaling function, cathartic function and teasing function. The evolutionary mechanism of negative emotion or evaluation is false politeness strategy and communicative subjectivity. The study of the implicit negative usage of “xiexie” provides a new Angle for the study of a class of words that indicate negative emotion or evaluation with positive meaning in communication.

목차
1.引言
2. “谢谢2”结构的形式特点
    2.1 “谢谢2”的组配要件
    2.2 “谢谢2”的位置分布
3. “谢谢2”属于隐性否定
    3.1 判定理据
    3.2 “谢谢2”的语用功能
4. “谢谢2”的形成机制
    4.1 本质:虚假礼貌策略
    4.2 动机:交际主观性
    4.3 两股推力
5. 结语
저자
  • 何倩(四川大学文学与新闻学院应用语言学与国际中文教育教研室助理研究员) | 하천
  • 袁立秋(兴义民族师范学院文学与传媒学院教师) | 원립추 Corresponding author
  • 林秀京(延世大学校中国研究院专职研究员) | 임수경
같은 권호 다른 논문