In this study, the seismic response characteristics of the three analysis model with or without TMD were investigated to find out the effective dome shape. The three analysis models are rib type, lattice type and geodesic type dome structure composed of space frame. The maximum vertical and horizontal displacements were evaluated at 1/4 point of the span by applying the resonance harmonic load and historical earthquake loads (El Centro, Kobe, Northridge earthquakes). The study of the effective TMD installation position for the dome structure shows that seismic response control was effective when eight TMDs were installed in all types of analysis model. The investigation of the efficiency of TMD according to dome shape presents that lattice dome and geodesic dome show excellent control performance, while rib dome shows different control performance depending on the historical seismic loads. Therefore, lattice and geodesic types are desirable for seismic response reduction using TMD compared to rib type.

1. 서론
2. 해석모델 일반사항
    2.1 해석모델 개요
    2.2 해석방법
3. 지진 응답 분석
    3.1 돔 구조물의 지진응답 분석
    3.2 TMD 설치 개수 및 위치에 따른 지진응답 분석
4. TMD 효율성 분석
5. 결론
감사의 글

• 구승연(학생회원, 영남대학교 일반대학원 건축학과, 석사과정) | Ku Seung-Yeon (Dept. of Architecture, Yeungnam University)
• 유상호(학생회원, 영남대학교 일반대학원 건축학과, 석사과정) | Yoo Sang-Ho (Dept. of Architecture, Yeungnam University)
• 김현수(정회원, 선문대학교 건축학부 교수, 공학박사) | Kim Hyun-Su (Division of Architecture, Sunmoon University)
• 강주원(정회원, 영남대학교 공과대학 건축학부 교수, 공학박사) | Kang Joo-Won (School of Architecture, Yeungnam University) 교신저자