논문 상세보기
pp.169-188
Recently, Korean government has incorporated the assessment and restoration of river continuity as a key component of its integrated water management policy. While, methodologies for evaluating discontinuities and degradation, as well as the procedures for assessment and restoration, have been developed and proposed, there is a need for further improvement. Therefore, further research is required to establish a conceptual framework for continuity specific to domestic river ecosystems and to formulate appropriate assessment methods and restoration strategies. In this study we conduct a comparative analysis of the concepts, restoration approaches, and comprehensive evaluation methods for river continuity as proposed by Japan, the United States, and the European Union (EU), all of which have long-standing frameworks for river continuity assessment and restoration projects. Each country demonstrates distinct objectives and guidelines: Japan emphasizes habitat continuity within the context of river and watershed continuity, the United States integrates continuity as a tool for watershed management, and the EU prioritizes biodiversity conservation by advocating for the removal of artificial barriers and promoting the restoration of free-flowing rivers (FFR). By investigating these international examples, this study provides insights that can guide the development of long-term strategies and evaluation criteria for securing aquatic ecosystem continuity in Korea.
국내 하천 연속성 단절 상황과연속성 확보 정책
일본의 하천 연속성 개념과 관리
1. 일본의 하천 연속성 개념과 관리 정책 방향
2. 일본의 하천 연속성 확보를 위한 평가 및 복원 지침
미국 EPA의 하천 연속성 개념과 관리
1. 미국 하천의 연속성 개념과 관리 정책 방향
2. 미국 하천의 연속성 확보를 위한 평가 및 복원 지침
유럽연합의 하천 연속성 개념과 관리
1. 유럽연합 연속성 개념과 관리 정책
2. 유럽연합의 하천 연속성 확보 지침; Criteria foridentifying free-flowing river stretches for the EU
결론 및 제언
적 요
REFERENCES
