논문 상세보기

Relationship Between Changes in Language Learning Beliefs and Changes in English Proficiency KCI 등재 SCOPUS

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/438066
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 6,700원
영어교육 (English Teaching)
한국영어교육학회 (The Korea Association of Teachers of English)
초록

This study investigated the relationship between changes in language learning beliefs and English proficiency among 41 Korean university students who participated in a short-term English program. Participants’ beliefs were assessed using the Beliefs About Language Learning Inventory (BALLI), and their proficiency was measured using the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC). Frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, paired-sample t-tests, and correlation analysis were employed to analyze the data. The study found significant improvements in both listening and reading scores, and changes in beliefs varied with proficiency gains. Students with higher proficiency gains demonstrated improved confidence and self-efficacy, and decreased instrumental motivation, whereas those with lower gains exhibited minimal changes in beliefs. Correlation analysis revealed that belief shifts, such as reduced selfconsciousness and increased integrative motivation, were positively related to proficiency gains. These findings suggest the dynamic nature of learners’ beliefs and their potential impact on language learning outcomes, highlighting the importance of addressing belief systems in English language education.

목차
1. INTRODUCTION
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1. Language Learning Beliefs and Their Relationship with Proficiency
    2.2. Changes in Language Learning Beliefs
    2.3. Efficacy of Short-Term English Programs
3. METHOD
    3.1. Participants
    3.2. Short-Term English Program
    3.3. Data Collection and Analysis
4. RESULTS
    4.1. Changes in English Proficiency
    4.2. Changes in Language Learning Beliefs
    4.3. Correlation Between Changes in Language Learning Beliefs andChanges in English Proficiency
5. Discussion and Conclusion
    5.1. Discussion
    5.2. Conclusion
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
저자
  • Jeongyong Yoon(PhD graduate, Department of Education, Ajou University)
  • Unkyoung Maeng(Professor, Graduate School of Education, Ajou University, Worldcupro 206, Yeongtong, Suwon 16499, Korea) Corresponding author