This study aims to to provide a systematic and sustainable strategic direction for road transportation ODA projects in Mozambique to help solve economic bottlenecks and contribute to national and regional economic growth at a time when the country is recovering from the economic shock and cessation of international aid caused by the past "Tuna Bond Scandal" and showing strong commitment to improving the road transportation sector led by the government. Through this, we aim to enhance the effectiveness of Korea's ODA projects and contribute to building a mutually beneficial cooperation model between Mozambique and Korea. Key indicators were established based on literature reviews, and an AHP survey was conducted targeting local road transport officials. The results were utilized to calculate the weights for each indicator and derive the project priorities. The study identified "sustainability" as the most critical factor among the social necessity indicators, highlighting the importance of long-term stability in road transport infrastructure. In the economic necessity category, "cost-effectiveness" emerged as a key priority, emphasizing resource optimization for maximum impact. Within policy necessity, alignment with government development goals was deemed essential for project success. Prioritization of road transport ODA projects based on sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with government policies is concluded to significantly enhance their impact. By addressing the immediate and long-term needs of Mozambique's transport infrastructure, the proposed strategy ensures resource efficiency and socioeconomic benefits. This approach not only improves the effectiveness of ODA initiatives but also fosters stronger partnerships between donor and recipient countries. Ultimately, the findings contribute to the development of systematic and sustainable ODA strategies for Mozambique.

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
    1.1. 연구 배경 및 목적
    1.2. 연구 범위
2. 기존 문헌 고찰
    2.1. 도로·교통 ODA와 경제성장
    2.2. 한국의 ODA와 정책
    2.3. 대모잠비크 ODA 추진 현황
    2.4. 선행 연구 분석
    2.5. 연구 차별성
3. 연구 방법론
    3.1. AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)기법
    3.2. 조사 대상 및 방법
4. 연구 결과
    4.1. 가중치 산정
    4.2. 우선 사업 순위 도출
    4.3. 개선 전략 제안
    4.4. 정책적 제언
5. 결론
    5.1. ODA 평가 모델 개선 및 이론적 시사점
    5.2. 연구 결과 종합
    5.3. 연구의 한계
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES

• 오민택(서울시립대학교 국제도시과학대학원) | Oh Mintaek
• 염춘호(서울시립대학교 국제도시과학대학원 교수) | Yeom Chunho Corresponding author