논문 상세보기

文字與羅各斯:航天命名的比較研究 — 中國與西方航天命名的文明型·政治符號學 KCI 등재

Logos and the Written Sign: A Comparative Study of Space Naming — Civilizational Semiotics and Political Symbolism in Chinese and Western Space Programs

  • 언어CHI
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/448017
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 6,100원
漢字硏究 (한자연구)
경성대학교 한국한자연구소 (Center For The Study of Chinese Charaters in Korea, Kyungsung University)
초록

This study builds upon the problem consciousness of the preceding paper and offers a genealogical analysis of the historical experience and political symbolism embedded in China’s space development naming system. In particular, it traces—on the basis of textual evidence, chronological reconstruction, and tabular analysis—the symbolic politics through which the Long March (長征) launch vehicles and the Dongfanghong (東方紅) satellite are genealogically connected to the subsequent series of Shenzhou (神舟), Tiangong (天宮), Tianwen (天問), and Zhurong (祝融). The analysis examines how these names organize national identity, socialist revolutionary memory, and traditional cosmological and poetic resources, exemplified by Qu Yuan’s Tianwen. Chapters 1-3 provide a detailed reconstruction of the internal genealogy of Chinese space naming practices, while Chapters 4-5 present a comparative civilizational analysis in relation to Western naming conventions, with supplementary reference to Russian, European, Japanese, and Indian cases. The core arguments of this paper are threefold. First, Chinese space naming interweaves revolutionary memory, traditional cosmology, and national strategy through the pictographic and semantic condensation characteristic of the logographic Chinese script (漢字). Second, the “revolution–technology” transformation mechanism established through Dongfanghong and Long March is systematized in the Shenzhou, Tiangong, Tianwen, and Zhurong programs. Third, this constellation of names simultaneously targets domestic mobilization and international branding, narrating a trajectory of self-reliance, national strengthening, and expansion toward deep space.

목차
目 錄
1.緒論:航天開發、帝國性空間與命名的政治①
2.政治符號學·命名學·文明型比較框架
3.中國航天命名的歷史·政治譜系
    (1)“長征”火箭:革命敘事的技術性轉換
    (2)“東方紅”一號:革命歌曲的太空播送與體制正當化
    (3)“神舟”“天宮”“天問”“祝融”:2000年代以降之接續
4.文明型比較:美國·俄羅斯·歐洲·日本·印度的命名法
    (1)美國
    (2)俄羅斯
    (3)歐洲(ESA)
    (4)日本(JAXA)
    (5)印度(ISRO)
5.“定居—移動”“文字—羅各斯”“神話—政治”——命名的雙重機制
6.結論與未來課題


저자
  • 金和英(慶星大學中國學系教授、國家教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地華東師範大學中國文字研究與應用中心兼職研究員) | Hwa-young KIM
같은 권호 다른 논문