논문 상세보기

How Cognitive Strategy Use and Lexical Quality Shape Reading Comprehension in Korean EFL Learners KCI 등재 SCOPUS

Kenn Arcenal, Yusun Kang
  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/453272
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 5,700원
영어교육 (English Teaching)
한국영어교육학회 (The Korea Association of Teachers of English)
초록

Both higher-order processes (HOP)–which include cognitive strategies such as inferencing and prediction–and vocabulary depth are widely acknowledged correlates of reading comprehension; however, their dynamic interplay in L2 reading remains unclear. The present study is a concurrent test of the Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis (LTH) and Lexical Quality Hypothesis (LQH) by modeling strategy use and lexical quality within a single explanatory framework. One hundred Korean seventh-grade EFL learners completed a battery of tests on various reading comprehension components. Results from the hierarchical regression analysis revealed no moderation effect between Oral Language Comprehension (OLC) and HOP, indicating a pattern that does not support a gradual or interactive version of LTH. Nevertheless, HOP retained significant predictive power when OLC was controlled. Vocabulary depth explained additional variance beyond OLC and HOP, supporting the LQH. The findings delineate unique contributions of cognitive strategy use and lexical depth to L2 reading and support theoretical and pedagogical models that scaffold HOP while systematically advancing lexical quality.

키워드
L2 reading comprehensionoral language comprehensionhigher-order processesreading strategiesvocabulary depthlexical threshold hypothesislexical quality hypothesisKorean EFL learners
목차
1. INTRODUCTION
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1. Oral Language Comprehension (OLC) as a Foundation for Reading
    2.2. The Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis in L2 Reading
    2.3. Higher-Order Processes: Inferencing and Prediction
    2.4. The Lexical Quality Hypothesis: Vocabulary Breadth vs. Depth
    2.5. The Present Study
3. METHOD
    3.1. Participants
    3.2. Measures
    3.3. Procedure
4. RESULTS
    4.1. Preliminary Analyses: Descriptive Statistics and Correlation
    4.2. Testing the Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis and Lexical QualityHypothesis: Hierarchical Regression Analysis
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
저자
  • Kenn Arcenal(Graduate Student, Department of English Language Education, College of Education, Korea University.)
  • Yusun Kang(Professor, Department of English Language Education, College of Education, Korea University; 145 Anam-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Korea) Corresponding author