논문 상세보기

Inspection Automation Maturity and Quality Performance in High-Reliability Aerospace and Defense Supply Chains: Comparative Analysis of Automated Equipment, Algorithmic Judgment, and Manual Judgment Dependence KCI 등재

우주․국방 고신뢰성 공급망의 검사자동화 성숙도와 품질성과: 자동화 설비, 알고리즘 판정 및 수동판정 의존도의 비교분석

Hong-Tae Kim, Geon-Hee Kim, Byung-Chan Min
  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/453343
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 5,100원
한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering)
초록

This study empirically examines how inspection automation maturity is associated with quality performance and operational burden in high-reliability aerospace and defense supply chains. In this study, high-reliability aerospace and defense supply chains are defined as supplier-side manufacturing, inspection, and quality-assurance processes for aerospace and defense-related parts, assemblies, and special processes, rather than the entire distribution or sales chain. Using 88 valid survey responses from personnel involved in quality, inspection, production, and IT/system-related tasks, this study operationalized inspection automation maturity as a formative composite index (X_AUTO) and as four component-level variables: automated or semi-automated inspection equipment use (E1), algorithm- or model-based judgment (E2), reduced dependence on manual judgment through reverse coding (E3_REV), and lead-time reduction attributable to automation at the inspection-activity level (E4). The dependent variables were lead-time burden (Y_LT), cost burden (Y_COST), and defect escape (Y_ESCAPE_ORD). Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, mean comparison by automation level, standardized OLS regression, ordinal logistic robustness analysis for the ordinal defect-escape variable, Harman's single-factor test, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Additional sensitivity analyses compared the four-component index with an alternative three-component index excluding E4, and model stability was assessed using 5,000 bootstrap resamples and repeated 10-fold cross-validation. The negative association with defect escape remained significant when E4 was excluded (β = - .996, p < .001; bootstrap 95% CI [-1.262, -0.808]), and cross-validated Q² values were positive across all models. The results show that the composite automation maturity index was negatively associated with defect escape, while it was positively associated with lead-time and cost burdens. Ordinal logistic regression produced a consistent negative association between X_AUTO and defect escape. At the component level, reduced dependence on manual judgment showed the most robust negative association with defect escape; however, this result should be interpreted cautiously because E3_REV was measured using a single reverse-coded item. These findings suggest that inspection automation in high-reliability supply chains should be understood as a combined process involving equipment-based data acquisition, algorithm-assisted judgment, standardized decision criteria, reduced dependence on manual judgment, and interorganizational integration of digital inspection data.

키워드
Aerospace and Defense Supply ChainInspection AutomationDefect EscapeAlgorithmic JudgmentManual Judgment DependenceCommon Method Bias
목차
1. 서 론
2. 연구방법
    2.1 연구설계 및 개념적 연구모형
    2.2 자료 및 표본
    2.3 변수의 조작적 정의
    2.4 자료 전처리 및 통계분석 절차
    2.5 분석상 유의점
3. 결과
    3.1 표본 특성 및 자료 선별 결과
    3.2 주요 변수의 기술통계 및 상관분석
    3.3 검사자동화 수준별 주요 결과변수 평균 차이
    3.4 검사자동화 성숙도와 품질성과 및 운영부담에대한 회귀분석
    3.5 강건성 및 민감도 분석
4. 논의
    4.1 검사자동화 성숙도와 품질성과․운영부담의관련성
    4.2 자동화 구성요소별 차별적 관련성
    4.3 결함 유출 감소에서 수동판정 의존도 감소의의미
    4.4 공급망 맥락과 운영부담의 해석
    4.5 이론적 및 실무적 시사점
    4.6 연구의 한계와 향후 연구 방향
5. 결론
References
저자
  • Hong-Tae Kim(Department of Advanced Convergence in Aerospace and Defense, Hanbat National University) | 김홍태 (국립한밭대학교 우주국방첨단융합학과)
  • Geon-Hee Kim(Department of Advanced Convergence in Aerospace and Defense, Hanbat National University) | 김건희 (국립한밭대학교 우주국방첨단융합학과)
  • Byung-Chan Min(Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University) | 민병찬 (국립한밭대학교 산업경영공학과) Corresponding author