본 연구에서는 정치관련 이슈정보에 대해 기초적인 게임메커닉스를 활용하여 정치인(정당)을 평가하는 블 록제인 기반의 게이미피케이션 시스템과 방법을 제안하고자 한다. 게이미피케이션은 플레이어들의 자발적 참여와 문제해결을 위해 게임적사고와 게임메커닉스(순위표, 점수, 단계, 가상증표, 아이템 등)를 적용하는 개념 이다. 게이미피케이션 연구에서 '플레이어'는 사용자, 관객, 고객, 손님, 구매자, 학습자, 환자, 군인 등을 포괄하므로, 이 논문에서 플레이어는 유권자(혹은 투표자)를 말하고, 이 표현들은 같은 의미로 병기하였다. 게이미피 케이션의 이론배경은 '게임요소'나 MDA프레임워크(게임메커닉스,게임역학,게임미학) 등의 '게임학 연구'를 기반 으로 한다. 이 논문에서는 효율적인 연구를 위해, 우선 기초적인 게임메커닉스만을 정치인(정당)의 성공적인 평가 시스템에 적용하였다. 정치인(정당) 평가에 게이미피케이션를 적용하려는 주목적은, 유권자(투표자)의 자 발적 정치참여를 독려하기 위함이며, 이 논문에서 제안하는 시스템과 방법이 적용된 이슈정보는 더 유익한 플 레이어 경험(PX) 창출에 도움을 줄 것이다. 끝으로, 본 정치 평가 인터렉티브 게임화 시스템과 방법 연구는, 보 안에 취약할 수밖에 없는 웹 또는 앱서비스의 한계를 보완하고자 블록체인을 기반으로 신뢰도를 높이고자 하였다.

This paper proposes a dynamical model for the gamification@learning and presents its simulation. Based on the theories of Game Design Features (GDF - cool features, fancy graphics, challenging puzzles, and an intriguing setting and story), Key Characteristics of a Learning Game (KCLG - Challenge, Curiosity, Fantasy and Control), a theory of educational environment design model (ARCS - attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction), and the theoretical background of Gamification labeled as the MDA (Mechanics, dynamics, and aesthetics) framework, four primary factors such as curiosity, challenge, fantasy and control have been originated. By using these four primary factors, the dynamical model for Gamification was developed. In this paper an example for the model is considered and simulated. The example and simulation make the values and characteristics of the four primary factors meaningful. I posit that this dynamical model for the gamification can strengthen the ‘theoretical foundation’ of gamification as well as spread the idea of ‘the pure and right function of game’.

Although the bottom-up rural area development project was conceived with great expectations, the general evaluation of the project so far reveals that it does not significantly differ from projects carried out in a top-down manner. This paper examines the nature of the bottom-up rural area development project with a focus on its background, including the roles of authority and project participants. Results revealed that the project was designed to be implemented in line with the state affairs ideology of the leader in a negative position of bureaucratic society. Though the form of implementation for the project seemed bottom-up as seen in the process of the roles and authorities in supporting organizations the top-down method of implementation can be seen in the authorities and roles of the central government. It was also noticed that the private sector, designed to elicit participation of various experts, looked to be managed and controlled by public organizations. The abovementioned signifies that the Korea rural area development project has been implemented not in a bottom-up manner but rather in an ever-strong top-down manner, which means that the central government holds more responsibility for the project's results, evaluation, and discussions. Furthermore, as seen in the background of the project, policies have been implemented in a top-down manner without the confidence of the bureaucratic society. Therefore, in order to implement a proper bottom-up rural area development project, there is a need for the bureaucratic society to have confidence in the rural societies.

In empirical studies on rural development projects, differentiation tends to be considered a strategy aimed at increasing the number of visitors. Rural development projects include the improvement of living environment, and the discussion about project goals and evaluation of project results are often focused on the aspect of rural tourism. Thus, subjective benefits of such projects for residents are omitted. This study examines the meaning of differentiation from the perspective of residents and explores the validity of the number of visitors and the possibility of reflecting residents' subjective score as evaluation indicators for a project. To achieve such an objective, this study uses survey data collected from 153 people in 38 comprehensive development projects in areas of Eup and Myeon, Korea. The results of this study show that differentiation is viewed as a by-product of positive improvement from a rural development project, from the perspective of residents. The effects of rural development are classified into two dimensions: socioeconomic effects and living environmental effects. Landscape improvement is included in the dimension of living environmental effects and an increase in the number of visitors is included in the dimension of socioeconomic effects. As such, they are confirmed to be the factors that determine the level of differentiation. For example, the increase in the number of visitors is confirmed to be a valid indicator of project success, in which two-dimensional characters are reflected. The level of differentiation evaluated by residents is a result of the workings of the above two factors. Unlike in previous studies, the possibility of evaluation based on the perception of residents is confirmed in the evaluation of results. When the level of differentiation is interpreted as the direct result of a project, the number of visitors has an impact on socioeconomic effects, and the project content of landscape improvement has an impact on living environmental effects. The goal of policy and residents is the same in terms of the effort residents may make in maximizing results of a project by themselves; thus, the government's goal is achieved even when a project is carried out under the autonomy of residents. Ultimately, the government should focus on providing conditions in which active citizen participation can not only occur but help to establish a policy direction, which subsequently strengthens the substantial rights of residents.