One of the central problems for today's philosophy is elucidation roles of individuals and communities in history. For modern researchers it is stress-free to keep a clear divided line between them, as well as between religious and secular, communalist and nationalist and etc. Such approach becoming a recognized problem and I want to suggest that one way of shedding light on the issue may lie in widening sphere of philosophical discourse on mind, without making simplistic distinctions between rational and irrational in history. At this context would be right to recognize that culture creates the human mind. Once this done, it becomes less complicated to evaluate not just the pass history but also the current socio-political trends of modern development, including Central-Asian. At this context I propose to stress role of communitarian mind and it's oppositions\links with today's nationalism in the region. Community-based social structures managed to survive for a long Central-Asian history. Islam as a dominant religion managed to accept communal diversity as a natural law here. Such frame is particularly observable since Central-Asian Muslims succeeded to develop and keep unique TurkishPersian (settled-nomad) cultural synthesis. However today we have heating up problems among all five modern Central Asian states (Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kirgizstan, Turkmenistan) and most experts could not able to have clear explanations on today's brinkmanship (borders, water, migrants and etc.). But on the roots of conflict is ignoring communitarian mind and accepting nationalism.