Human embryonic stem (ES) cells are a potential source of cells for developmental studies and for a variety of applications in transplantation therapies and drug discovery. However, human ES cells are difficult to culture and maintain at a large scale, which is one of the most serious obstacles in human ES cell research. Culture of human ES cells on MEF cells after disassociation with accutase has previously been demonstrated by other research groups. Here, we confirmed that human ES cells (H9) can maintain stem cell properties when the cells are passaged as single cells under a feeder-free culture condition. Accutase-dissociated human ES cells showed normal karyotype, stem cell marker expression, and morphology. We prepared frozen stocks during the culture period, thawed two of the human ES cell stocks, and analyzed the cells after culture with the same method. Although the cells revealed normal expression of stem cell marker genes, they had abnormal karyotypes. Therefore, we suggest that accutase-dissociated single cells can be usefully expanded in a feeder-free condition but chromosomal modification should be considered in the culture after freeze-thawing.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells can self-renew maintaining the undifferentiated state. Self renewal requires many factors such as Oct4, Sox2, FoxD3, and Nanog. NF- is a transcription factor involved in many biological activities. Expression and activity of NF- increase upon differentiation of ES cells. Reportedly, Nanog protein directly binds to NF- protein and inhibits its activity in ES cells. Here, we found a potential binding site of NF- in the human Nanog promoter and postulated that NF- protein may regulate expression of the Nanog gene. We used human embryonic carcinoma (EC) cells as a model system of ES cells and confirmed decrease of Nanog and increase of NF- upon differentiation induced by retinoic acid. Although deletion analysis on the DNA fragment including NF- binding site suggested involvement of NF- in the negative regulation of the promoter, site-directed mutation of NF- binding site had no effect on the Nanog promoter activity. Furthermore, no direct association of NF- with the Nanog promoter was detected during differentiation. Therefore, we conclude that NF- protein may not be involved in transcriptional regulation of Nanog gene expression in EC cells and possibly in ES cells.