This study proposes a dynamic evaluation framework for diagnosing signal control adequacy using high-resolution Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures (ATSPM) data. Traditional signal performance assessments have primarily relied on aggregated metrics, such as average delay and volume-to-capacity ratio, which are effective for evaluating overall operational efficiency but insufficient for capturing cycle-level control limitations and temporal variability. Although split failure-based measures, including the Split Failure Ratio (SFR), provide more direct insights into green time adequacy, most existing applications focus on the failure frequency within a fixed analysis period. To address this limitation, this study introduces a Dynamic Operational Strain (DOS) index that extends the split failure into a time-evolving state variable incorporating accumulation and recovery mechanisms. By modeling the recursive evolution of the operational strain, the proposed framework captures how often failures occur and how they persist or dissipate over time. Phase-level DOS measures are subsequently aggregated at the intersection level to derive a priority score reflecting structural control inadequacy. The framework is further applied to classify intersections using DOS–SFR quadrant analysis, enabling the identification of distinct operational patterns, such as persistent oversaturation, localized phase imbalance, intermittent strain accumulation, and stable control conditions. The results demonstrate that intersections with similar SFR values may exhibit substantially different temporal strain structures, highlighting the importance of a dynamic state-based evaluation. The proposed approach provides a diagnostic foundation for data-driven signal re-timing and future adaptive control strategies by shifting the signal performance assessment from static frequency-based measures to dynamic structural adequacy analysis.

Apartments such as those on the 29th floor are generally classified as high-rise buildings; however, they may be excluded from certain safety regulations since they do not meet the legal definition of "high-rise" buildings. According to the Korean Building Act, buildings with 30 or more floors are typically regarded as high-rise buildings, warranting specific disaster prevention and safety standards. Nevertheless, buildings between 20 and 30 floors are often excluded from high-rise building regulations, which may lead to relatively insufficient safety standards and has been identified as a "blind spot in safety management." Enhancing appropriate safety facilities and strengthening regulations for such buildings is crucial, particularly in areas such as fire prevention, evacuation planning, and fire-fighting facilities. This study compares and examines the evacuation times of designated evacuation safety zones and emergency elevators in high-rise apartments as defined by the Building Act and in buildings constructed with floors between 20 and 30 through evacuation simulations.

This study focused on comparing the meteorological conditions in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) on high-event days and non-event days in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA). We utilized observed PM10 and meteorological variables at the surface as well as at the upper heights. The results showed that high-event days were consistently associated with lower wind speed, whereas wind direction showed no particular difference between high-event and non-event days with frequent westerlies and northwesterlies for both cases. During high-event days, the temperature was much warmer than the monthly normal values with a sharp increasing trend, and Relative Humidity (RH) was higher than the monthly normal, especially on high-event days in February. During high-event days in spring, a double inversion layer was present at surface and upper heights. This indicates that stability in the multi-layer is an important indicator of higher PM10 concentrations. Net radiation in spring and winter is also closely associated with higher PM10 concentrations. Strong net radiation resulted in large sensible heat, which in turn facilitated a deeper mixing height with diluted PM10 concentrations; in contrast, PM10 concentrations were higher when sensible heat in spring and winter was very low. We also confirmed that convective and friction velocity was higher on non-event days than on high-event days, and this was especially obvious in spring and winter. This indicated that thermal turbulence was dominant in spring, whereas in winter, mechanical turbulence was dominant over the SMA.