This study explored factors that affect the risk of excluding the support due to recidivism of the recipients within the support period of the housing support projects among the rehabilitation protection projects of the Korea Rehabilitation Agency. The subjects of this analysis were released prisoners who applied and supported by the project from 2005 to September 2009. Continuous survival analysis was used to supplement the limitations of existing logistic regression analysis for the loss of information about the duration of an event (recidivism). The summary of the analysis results is as follows. First, 2.76 % of all recipients of the housing support projects were excluded because of recidivism within the support period. On a three-month basis of analysis, the risk ratio was the highest at 0.0046 (0.46 out of 100) over 7-9 months period. In addition, the cumulative risk ratio of the entire period showed that if the recidivism is not committed for over six years after the start of the support, the likelihood of excluding the support in the future is quite low. Next, the results of the cox regression analysis affecting the risk of exclusion of support due to recidivism showed that health conditions, number of convictions, and the type of committed crime had statistically significant effects. Specifically, those who are in good health, have two or more criminal records, or have a history of village affairs, were found to have increased risk of excluding the support compared to those who are not. Finally, the interpretation of the above results and policy implications were discussed in conclusions and suggestions.

. Things we have learned. II . The new Design model Ill. The New Loess housing Model ill. The Building Strategy IV. Use of New Technology

Purpose: The problem of housing poverty among young people is a very important problem for the nation. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to identify the problems of the government's housing support policy for young people. And it is in presenting specific solutions by fully reflecting the opinions of experts. Research design, data and methodology: This study consisted of analyzing the following three research topics: 1) the differences of youth residential support housing policy impact on young adults’ housing stability, 2) the problems and solutions of youth housing support policy, and 3) the differences of experts' opinions on the impact of government policy on youth housing stability. The subject of this study is the government's seven housing policies for young people. The targets include Happy Public Rental Housing (Happiness Housing), Station Area Rental Housing for youth (Station Area 2030), Public Dormitory for College Students (Public Dormitory & Hope Dormitory), Jeonse Rental Housing for College Students (Subject Lease Rental Housing for College Students), Social Housing for Young People, and Share House. The data was organized through expert surveys from 1st to 30th June 2020. The experts surveyed include professors & researchers, public officer & public institutions staff, and private developers of young adults’ housing. The methodology of analysis on the problem and the solution of government policy was Frequency analysis. And analysis methods on differences of experts’ opinion were ANOVA, Levene’ test, and Schefe test. Results: Problems in Government's youth residential support housing policy include high rents, lack of supply, difficulty in acquiring rental housing, inconvenience in using shared spaces, conflicts with cohabitants, and invasion of privacy. Solutions include expanding supply to urban areas, establishing long-term plans, securing privacy, diversifying business methods, establishing platforms for rental housing transactions, and expanding various public support (financial support, etc). Conclusions: There was a difference in perception among groups of experts on the impact of public rental housing (called ‘happiness housing’) in youth housing stability. It is very urgent to come up with the most reasonable policy to support youth housing. This requires in-depth discussions by experts to narrow their differences.

The objective of the study is to establish principles of space planning required to create community gardens for improving self-support capability of vulnerable groups. The characteristics of community garden users and the purposes of community gardens were considered when setting these principles. The target users are vulnerable groups. In considering the circumstance of the homeless who have difficulties in overcoming physical, mental, social and financial risks, 13 universal design principles were applied: Equitable use, flexibility in use, simple and intuitive use, perceptible information, tolerance for error, low physical effort, size and space for approach and use, self-supporting, aesthetics, economic feasibility, environment friendly, healthiness, and sustainability. As the space planning principles based on the community garden purposes are set to achieve mental, social and financial self-support, healing garden and urban agriculture were combined in the principles. Maximally efficient division of space where various programs are available, privacy-protected space, rest areas for strengthening resilience and health, pleasant and beautiful spaces with plants, easily accessible and safe space, and easy maintenance and sustainability are required factors for community gardens. As the ultimate goal, financial self-support, a space where they can develop acquired skills and then proceed with productive activities was included in the space planning principles. Additionally, ecological aspects such as cycle of materials, efficient energy use and expanded biodiversity were combined and supported by local communities to secure sustainability of the use of space.