본 연구는 아동 건강권 보장을 위한 지방자치단체 조례를 분석하여 지 역 단위의 법적‧제도적 대응 수준을 평가하고 정책적 함의를 도출하는 곳인데 목적이 있다. 분석방법으로는 자치법규정보시스템에서 수집한 아 동 건강권 관련 조례 38개를 대상으로 규범성과 실효성 체계를 중심으로 분석틀을 구성하고 이를 비교 분석하였다. 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫 째, 다수의 조례는 일정 수준의 규범성을 확보하고 있었으며, 정신건강, 금연‧절주, 영양 관리 등 아동의 전인적 건강권에 대한 지역사회의 관심 이 반영되고 있었다. 둘째, 전달체계 조항은 주로 강행규정으로 구성되어 실효성 기반이 마련되어 있었다. 셋째, 재정 책임, 전문 인력 구성, 벌칙 조항 등 핵심 실효성 요소는 미흡하거나 임의규정에 그쳤으며, 조례 간 명칭‧용어‧대상 규정의 일관성 부족과 디지털 과의존, 성 건강 등 최근 이슈의 반영 한계도 드러났다. 연구결과를 기반으로, 아동 건강권의 법적 지위 명확화, 강행규정 확대를 통한 실행력 강화, 지역 맞춤형 정책 수립 을 위한 근거 기반 행정, 조례 실행 역량 강화를 위한 교육 및 지원 체 계 구축 등 정책 과제를 제안하였다.

In this study, we evaluated the filtering effect of the fine dust mask. Our objective research has secured credibility in the private sector. The performance of domestic fine dust masks is evaluated by three dust collection efficiencies, inspiratory resistance, and leakage rate according to KF grade in the health mask standard guidelines issued by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Based on this, eight types of fine dust masks were evaluated for dust collection efficiency and face intake resistance. All masks showed good performance as the collection efficiency was 90%. The higher the KF grade, the higher the collection efficiency, but the inspiratory resistance had no correlation with the grade. According to the manufacturer's operation method, masks below the standard value may be distributed. Masks that are currently on the market have shown results that can be trusted. However, we hope that the system will be improved to validate whether the masks that meet the threshold are still being distributed.

There is increased recognition of prisoners’ rights to healthcare and the right to be protectedagainst inhumane and degrading treatment. A prisoner has a right to the healthcare equivalent of any person in their community. This trend has encouraged many correctionalpolicymakers to engage in efforts to improve the levels of correctional healthcare in thecontext of human rights and to establish international standards of correctional healthcare,such as those cited in ‘Making Standard Work’ and ‘Health in Prisons’. This study compressed the issues of the right to healthcare into four parts and applied to the correctional healthcare system in Korea. In Korea, according to the results of the study,the right to healthcare of inmates in correctional institutions is guaranteed to some extent, but the gap between the normative frame and the reality is prominent. First, in the living conditions at correctional institutions, the problem of overcrowding is remarkably noticeable. With respect to ensuring correctional medical resources, a shortage of medicalpersonnel and the inferior state of the sickrooms that do not meet the criteria were found.Particularly, focusing on outside medical care, the issue of correctional medical expenditurehas been highlighted, due to the continuous increase in medical costs. Finally, the efforts for health promotion and treatment of mental health care are merely formalities. In orderto reduce the gap between international standards and actual conditions of correctionalinstitutions and to promote these rights effectively, close cooperation between the responsiblebodies is required.