The purpose of this study was to use the Kano model to compare and analyze the educational service quality attributes of domestic and foreign culinary arts schools. For this purpose, a questionnaire-based survey was completed by 312 students who were studying in domestic and foreign culinary schools. The results of the study indicated that 23 of the total 25 attributes were significantly different between domestic and foreign culinary arts school.; the “minium 4 hour-kitchen class" and “mandatory internship program” were classified into “indifferent quality” for domestic schools and a “must-be quality” for foreign schools; “well-organized internship guidebook”, “kitchen class limited to 20 students”, “introducing the latest food or restaurant trends”, “library with the latest publications related to major”, “objective instructor's evaluation”, “detailed instructor's evaluation”, “instructor's field experience”, and “decent communication skills on the part of the instructor” attributes were classified into “attractive quality” for domestic schools and “must-be quality” for foreign schools; and “kitchen classes operated by block system”, and “foreign instructors for each ethnic cuisine” attributes were classified into “indifferent” and “attractive quality” for both domestic and foreign schools, respectively. Also, according to the Better and Worse quotient designed by Timko, there were more attributes for domestic school than for foreign school that scored over 0.5 in the Better category and fewer attributes for domestic than the foreign scored over 0.5 in the Worse category. The results also indicate that, students in foreign schools receive an educational service of better quality than students in a domestic school. As a result, this research suggests significant implications to develop culinary educational services.