검색결과

검색조건
좁혀보기
검색필터
결과 내 재검색

간행물

    분야

      발행연도

      -

        검색결과 2

        1.
        2016.10 구독 인증기관·개인회원 무료
        The study aims to assess viability, acrosomal menbrane, integrity and mitochondria membrane potential of sperm separated using a percoll density gradient(45% and 90%) and swim-up methods using Hanwoo epididymal sperm frozen semen. Briefy, motile sperm separated using a percoll gradient and swim-up. 25 μl of sperm dilution from droplets were transferred to 1.5 mL tube and incubated with fluorescent probes at 39°C in dark as follows. After incubation, 75 μl of 5,5',6,6'-tetrachloro-1,1',3,3'- -JC-1; Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection kit, Cell Technology Inc., USA) working solution was mixed with sperm dilution and incubated for 30 min. One μl of Hoechst 33342 (H1339; Molecular Probe, Eugene, OR, USA) stock solution was mixed with sperm dilution and incubated for 10 min. And then, 0.5 μl of propidium iodide (PI) stock solution and 0.5 μl of fluorescein peanut agglutinin FITC conjugate (FITC-PNA; Vector Laboratories, FL-1071) were mixed with sperm dilution and incubated for 8 min. After mixing with fluorescent probes and sperm dilution, 5 μl of stained sperm dilution was mounted on a slide glass and covered with cover glass. More than 200 sperms in a slide glass were counted with × 400 magnification by fluorescent microscope (Eclipse Ci_L, Nikon, JAPAN) and evaluated viability, acrosomal membrane integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential of sperm with triple band filter (DAPI/FITC/TRITC; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Live sperm were stained with Hoechst 33342(blue) and dead sperm were stained with PI (red). Damaged acrosomal membrane of sperm was stained with FITC-PNA (green) and intact acrosomal membrane of sperm was not stained. Both of sperm swim-up method with or without BSA separated to Live intact mitochondria (15.39±4.31 vs, 12.58±3.74, and) without significant difference. and percoll density gradient method also similar (7.29±6.54), swim-up method of sperm preparation appeared to be more efficacious in percentage recovery of motile sperm concentration compared to Density gradient method.