이 연구는 과거 안전교육 실적, 선원통계연보, 안전교육대상자, 안전교육증서의 유효기간, 선원의 취업률 및 정년퇴직 연령 등의 여러 요소를 고려하여 안전교육대상인원을 예측하고, 선원안전교육 수행 기관의 교육 수용능력을 분석하여 안전교육 수요증대와 집중화 문제를 해소할 수 있는지 분석하였다. 향후 5년간 연평균 안전교육 수요는 선원법 기준으로 약 10,444명으로 예상되며, 현재 안전교육기관이 수용할 수 있는 적정 인원은 연평균 7,280여명으로 조사되었다. 따라서 선원법 개정에 따른 안전교육 수요증대에 효율적으로 대응하기 위해서는 안전교육시설을 확충하여 안전교육 수용능력을 확대할 필요가 있다.

This study purposes to examine the effects of two types of revision training (teacher feedback-aided and protocol-aided revision training) on L2 student writers’ revision and written product and quality, compared with their self-revision and also to analyze L2 writers’ perceptions on revision training through a pre- and post-training questionnaire survey. The results of the study show positive effects of both types of training; more positive effects of teacher feedback-aided revision training on the quality and product of writing, especially in less proficient writers; more significant effects of protocol-based revision training on revision frequency, content changes, and success ratio of revision, especially in less-proficient writers; and more local (content preserving) revisions triggered by teacher feedback, especially in more proficient writers. Though teacher feedback-aided revision was favored over protocol-aided revision after training, the participants’ perception on the former’s positive effects and utilization rate decreased, but their perception on the latter’s positive effects and utilization rate enhanced. The present study suggests protocol-aided revision as an alternative revision method, and different revision methods depending on the focus of revision and L2 writing proficiency.