The inquiry about the relationship between mind and the world is a question that attracted a lot of philosophers, scientists and other researchers' great attention. It also gets some attention in Chinese traditional philosophy. In this paper, I focus on the construction of the ethical world in Wang Yang Ming's philosophy. The most important question that I concern is how the ethical world is built from Wang's point of view. According to Wang's theory, the world is built in our mind, which means it exists in our intentional activity, which is facing the outside material world and connected to it. The world exists when there is an intentional activity. Based on Wang's theory, I try to make a comparison between Wang yangming and some Western philosophers, such as Edmund Husserl, George Berkeley, through different concept of the "World". Firstly, I give a brief introduction about Wang yangming's philosophy of Mind ( Xin xue {.'~)and explain the construction of the world of meaning in Wang's theory. Second, Wang's explanation has a lot in common with some Western scholars' theory, but they are not always facing the problem in the same sense. I would try to distinguish their differences in the relation between mind and the world, at the same time, to clarify in what sense they use the concept of world. Finally, through the comparison above, I offer some provisional conclusions about the inquiry on the relation between mind and the world.

Traditional Chinese Philosophy is different with the Western Philosophy as metaphysics of substance and epistemology for inquiry cosmos, world and knowledge. Its interest lies in considering the relationship between man and world, man and man, man and himself, in order to construct ethic aesthetical and value world of meaning. Therefore, Chinese Philosophical Human Studies of humanism directly concern the issue of mind. There is not only theory of Mind-Nature, but also many scholars regard Confucianism as Philosophy of Mind, so that some see Chinese Philosophy as Philosophy of Mind. These understanding are coincident with postmodern Mind Ecology Studies in the perspective of Process Philosophy, so we. can say that Chinese Philosophy of Mind has the meaning of Mind Ecology Studies, and the latter further demonstrates the contemporary theoretic value and meaning of practice from Chinese Philosophy of Mind. Hence, three issues have to be discussed in this paper. First one is the Mind as Absolute Subject and Its Characters. The traditional Chinese Philosophy always see mind as an absolute subject which dominates everything, concerns everything in the universe, moreover, the mind as absolute subject has characters of wholeness and introversion. Second one is The Mind with Praxis Function for Growing and Developing. The growing and developing is a process, so the mind is not entity but spiritual praxis for actualizing Sage Realm of morality. In the course, various factors and relations of the mind get synergy in the thinking of organism and holism. Third one is Seeing Chinese Philosophy of Mind from Mind Ecology Studies.