논문 상세보기
Remarks on the Phenomena of V-PP Complex in English Pseudogapping KCI 등재
초록
This paper is concerned with how NP/DP or PP survives as a remnant in English pseudogapping when an intransitive verb plus a preposition is used in a postcedent clause. In this regard, this paper makes two major claims: first, the criterion for reanalysis vs. non-reanalysis of the intransitive verb and preposition depends on semantic properties, and second, focus movement cum-deletion mechanism yields the remnant of NP/DP or PP.
키워드
목차
1. Introduction
2. Toward Previous Analysis
2.1. Jayaseelan (1990): Extraposition (=Heavy NP Shift)
2.2. Lasnik (1995a, 1995b, 2001): Object Shift (=A Movement)
3. Proposal: Focus Movement-Cum VP Deletion Mechanism onSemantics-Syntax Interface
3.1. Semantic Characteristics: Reanalysis vs. Non-Realnalysis
3.2. A Contrastive Focus
3.3. The Elision Constituent: VP
3.4. The VP Deletion Processes of the Examples (16) and (17)
3.5. Application to VP Ellipsis
4. Concluding Remarks
References
2. Toward Previous Analysis
2.1. Jayaseelan (1990): Extraposition (=Heavy NP Shift)
2.2. Lasnik (1995a, 1995b, 2001): Object Shift (=A Movement)
3. Proposal: Focus Movement-Cum VP Deletion Mechanism onSemantics-Syntax Interface
3.1. Semantic Characteristics: Reanalysis vs. Non-Realnalysis
3.2. A Contrastive Focus
3.3. The Elision Constituent: VP
3.4. The VP Deletion Processes of the Examples (16) and (17)
3.5. Application to VP Ellipsis
4. Concluding Remarks
References
저자
같은 권호 다른 논문
