PURPOSES : In general, a high-performance concrete construction method is a method of loading mixed cement and other materials on a mobile mixer equipped with a concrete plant. However, the construction cost is high because the unit cost of the mixed cement is very high and the equipment usage fee of the mobile mixer is also high. To compensate for these drawbacks, a cellular spray concrete method was developed. This is a highly functional customized concrete construction method in which admixtures are added to high-flow concrete with cellular (air bubbles) added at the site and constructed through spraying. METHODS : Field workability evaluation using cellular concrete was carried out using a spray method in 2017 and an anti-foaming agent in 2018. The test construction section was set as a new road-pavement construction site. After construction, strength, durability characteristics, and void analysis were performed to compare the construction methods. The results of laboratory tests under optimal conditions were also compared to the on-field results. By comparing the indoor mixing and the on-field results, we analyzed whether there were any problems concerning the performance expression. The economic feasibility at the initial construction stage was analyzed by comparing the existing and the cellular concrete construction methods in terms of material cost and equipment usage fee. RESULTS : In the case of cellular spray concrete, construction through spraying is cumbersome, and the need to additionally use large equipment such as a pump car and compressor constitutes a disadvantage. However, the most relevant feature is that it can be constructed not only on the floor, but also on a slope. In the case of cellular concrete with an antifoaming agent, it was possible to quickly produce high-performance concrete using on-site remixing equipment. By supplying materials to the pouring surface using a conveyor, smooth construction and construction in narrow spaces were also possible. CONCLUSIONS : The cellular concrete method allows the immediate on-site production of high-performance concrete, and it is possible to selectively apply spray construction, antifoaming agent construction, etc.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to compare the alkali-silica reactivity for mortar bar and concrete prism specimens using crushed aggregates of 5 types in Korea. And the alkali-silica reactivity for those aggregates are measured by chemical test method. METHODS: The alkali-silica reactivity for those aggregates was measured by chemical test method of KS F 2545, mortar-bar test of KS F 2546, accelerated mortar-bar test method of ASTM C 1260 and concrete prism test method of ASTM C 1293, relatively. RESULTS: The alkali-silica reactivity for those aggregates was verified by chemical test of KS F 2546 and accelerated mortar-bar test of ASTM C 1260. However, it was not by mortar-bar test of KS F 2546 and concrete prism test of ASTM C 1293. CONCLUSIONS: The above results showed that relationship among the four test methods were very low. The results from 3 types of test methods using cement-aggregate combinations appeared to be different. Because the environmental conditions of test methods for measuring the alkali-silica reactivity such as equivalent alkali content(external source), humidity, temperature, and times were different though the aggregates were same. Moreover, alkali-silica reactivity showed the biggest impact when alkalis were supplied form outside and exposed to environmental conditions. The accelerated mortar-bar test method seems to be most appropriate test method for concrete structures exposed to alkali environment.

본 논문에서는 ASTM C 1260을 이용하여 국내산 골재를 대상으로 알칼리-실리카 반응 판정 결과 반응성으로 판정된 골재를 대상으로 알칼리-실리카 반응 억제효과를 고찰하기 위하여 플라이애시와 질산리튬을 사용한 시멘트 경화체의 ASTM C 1260 적용성을 평가하였다. 알칼리-실리카 반응에 의한 팽창현상이 발생하는 지역에서 CaO 함량이 낮은 플라이애시를 시멘트 중량의 10, 20, 30%를 대체하는 경우 ASTM C 1260으로 알칼리-실리카 반응 억제효과를 확인할 수 있었다. 그러나 질산리튬을 사용할 경우는 ASTM C 1260은 시편을 1N NaOH 수용액에 수침하여 80℃의 온도로 길이변화를 유도하므로 시편내에 혼입된 질산리튬 성분이 외부로 용출될 수 있기 때문에 알칼리-실리카 반응 억제효과를 도출하지 못하였다. 따라서 질산리듐의 ASR 억제효과를 확인하기 위해서는 다른 시험방법을 고려해야 한다.

국내에서는 콘크리트 포장용 굵은 골재를 대상으로 화학적인 시험방법과 모르타르 봉 시험방법을 이용한 결과 알칼리-실리카 반응 유해 가능성이 낮은 것으로 알려져 왔으나, 최근에 알칼리 - 실리카 반응에 의한 파손이 발생되었고, ASTM C 1260을 이용한 결과 일부 골재에서 유해한 팽창이 발생된다고 보고되었다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 모르타르 봉 시험방법인 KS F 2546과 ASTM C 1260을 이용하여 길이 팽창 유도기간의 환경조건이 알칼리 - 실리카 팽창 반응 특성에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 하였다. KS F 2546의 경우 대상 골재 모두 반응성 없음으로 판정되었으나 ASTM C 1260에서는 일부 골재에서 잠재반응성 이상으로 판정되었다. 이는 외부로부터의 알칼리 이온의 공급, 온도 및 습도 차이에 의하여 발생한 것으로 판단된다. 또한 ASTM C 1260에서 NaOH의 농도변화 실험을 통하여 NaOH의 농도가 증가할수록 길이팽창이 현저하게 증가한다는 것을 확인하였으며, 온도 및 습도가 증가함에 따라 길이팽창이 증가한다는 것을 확인하였다.