Civil engineering structures are damaged due to secondary damages from floods. The purpose of this study is a comparative study of past recovery cases and disaster recovery scenarios developed. Disaster recovery scenarios developed with respect to the 6 structures for rapid recovery. The development scenarios were compared with past recovery cases. The results were consistent 70%.

Test-bed was constructed in Honam High-speed railway due to evaluate the suitable infrastructure for operation of 400km/h level speed. To evaluate performance of roadbed in test-bed, several sensors installed in the standard roadbed, soft ground, transition zone as bridge and earthwork. In contrast to existing long-term monitoring, system developed was designed and builted on site to log-time operation automatically. Therefore, the measured data collected monitoring system and analysis results can be databased continuously from construction to operation of railway for study design criteria about long-term behavior of roadbed.

To evaluate residual settlement of the high-speed railway trackbed, it is hard to apply immediately settlement analysis because in-situ ground has additional creep or secondary consolidation behavior. To select the settlement analysis method, this study compared measurement data with hyperbolic, Asaoka, Hoshino method result. All residual settlement analysis method has a tendency to be underestimated because of in-situ creep behavior, however all the method are reliable because R2 is high(over 0.94) and RMSE(Root Mean Square Error) is low. The additional measurement data comparison shows that hyberbolic method is the most appropriate method with high accuracy and application.