검색결과

검색조건
좁혀보기
검색필터
결과 내 재검색

간행물

    분야

      발행연도

      -

        검색결과 18

        1.
        2022.10 구독 인증기관·개인회원 무료
        In this study, a manual that can be applied to conflict management of clearance waste recycling by stakeholders was researched to recycle clearance waste that is most frequently generated when decommissioning nuclear power plants. In order to develop a manual that can be applied to conflict management, the content of the conflict should be derived first. In order to derive conflict, it is necessary to organize major issues in recycling clearance waste in consideration of domestic nuclear energy and social environment. In order to organize major issues in consideration of the domestic environment, a literature survey and a domestic current situation investigation were conducted. At this time, the subject of the major issue was selected based on the Level 1 influencing factors of the previous study. As a result of the investigation, it was confirmed that there were many major issues due to lack of reliability/understanding in nuclear energy/radiation. Through this Conflicts caused by recycling clearance waste were derived based on the organized issues. As a result of deriving conflicts, eight conflicts were derived below. 1) Reduced business availability due to lack of understanding/reliability 2) Lack of reliability in the selection and technology of nuclide analysis technology 3) Additional time and equipment required due to establishment of clearance waste regulatory requirements 4) Low economic benefits due to reduction in the effect of substituting raw materials 5) Political interference due to worsening public opinion 6) Rejection of final products due to recycling due to distrust of radiation 7) Public acceptance along the transport route from the source to the recycling plant 8) Business promotion deteriorated due to changes in energy policy As a result of the derived conflict analysis, the most conflicts related to lack of reliability/understanding in nuclear energy/radiation were derived. Accordingly, in future research, it is necessary to prepare a specific plan to enhance the understanding of stakeholders about self-disposal waste recycling. Considering that research that can solve the conflicts that will be faced when the domestic/foreign clearance waste recycling industry is activated is not activated, this study is meaningful in that it derived the conflicts that will be faced when recycling clearance waste. Also, it is expected that the conflicts derived from this study will be used meaningfully in the establishment of the clearance waste recycling management manual.
        2.
        2022.10 구독 인증기관·개인회원 무료
        The decommissioning of Kori Unit 1 is expected to generate a large amount of clearance waste. Disposing of a large amount of clearance waste is economically costly, so a recycling method has emerged. However, clearance waste recycling is expected to cause many conflicts among various stakeholders. In the previous study, possible conflicts were selected in consideration of the domestic environment and major issues. Based on this, this study classifies stakeholders involved in conflicts by group, and suggests ways to enhance understanding by stakeholder and enhance reliability. In this study, stakeholders are classified into four groups that share the same conflicts, and each of the following measures is suggested. 1) Stakeholder Engagement. 2) Common understanding of radiation risks, dialogue between the public/recycling industry/ regulatory agency. 3) Incentives to promote recycling clearance waste. 4) Reliable outlet store for recyclable clearance waste. The above understanding enhancement measures are presented so that a solution to conflict can be smoothly derived when designing a clearance waste-related consultative body composed of interested parties in the future. As a more specific solution, measures to enhance stakeholder trust can be suggested for each understanding enhancement measure. Reliability enhancement measures are also presented so that they can be applied to each stakeholder group, and these are as follows. 1) Write a stakeholder engagement plan, Measures for stakeholder participation in measuring the radioactivity concentration of clearance waste. 2) Active use of easy-to-understand radioactivity comparison data, Expansion of information on environmental radiation dose to public, nuclear/radiation education, Held a tour event at the nuclear power plant decommissioning site, New website for clearance waste information disclosure. 3) Incentives for recycling industries in which the Ministry of Environment or KHNP partially bears the losses that occur when the sales rate is low. Incentives are provided to consumers by including recyclables of clearance waste for Green Card’s green consumption points. 4) Online outlets open for recyclable clearance waste with easy-to-understand radioactivity comparison data. It is expected that if the above-mentioned reliability enhancement measures are used, it will be possible to secure the trust of stakeholders and reduce the gap between stakeholders in the future clearance-related consultative body.
        3.
        2022.05 구독 인증기관·개인회원 무료
        The decommissioning of Kori unit 1 is just around the corner. Accordingly, it is required to construct a hot cell facility for decommissioning nuclear power plants to analyze the characteristics of intermediate-level waste and low-level waste generated in the decommissioning process. In this study, a Design Base Accident (DBA) scenario of the facility is developed. To identify and characterize potential hazards at the facility, a Preliminary Fact Sheet (PFS) is filled out and consider external events in consideration of the surrounding site environment. The external event screening and evaluation method is based on the external event evaluation method covered in the probabilistic risk assessment. In PFS, only natural and artificial hazards that may have a meaningful impact on the facility are considered as the sources of the accident, and accident prevention and mitigation systems, etc., which exist in each compartment or facility, are described. Based on PFS and external events, potential hazard assessment is systematically performed using each potential hazards, impact and defense function identified using the preliminary hazard analysis (PHA) methodology. The potential hazard analysis methodology applied to this assessment is a qualitative assessment method consistent with the US DOE Hazard Analysis methodology (DOE 1992b; DOE 1994b). After that, the potential mitigation functions that can be used under normal, abnormal and accident conditions are examined, and the contribution of public and workers to safety is evaluated. The results of the PHA are basic data that prioritize potential hazards and can be used to develop potential accident scenarios. Among potential hazards generally considered for non-reactor facilities, only possible accidents during operation of the facilities are selected as potential hazards. The level of potential hazards is obtained by qualitatively examining the frequency and consequence estimates for each hazard or accident scenario developed in PHA. Based on the results of the potential hazards assessment, representative accidents that require further quantitative analysis are screened. Selected accidents are DBA and are the most dangerous and most significant impacts on workers.
        4.
        2022.05 구독 인증기관·개인회원 무료
        In this study, the current situation of recycling domestic and foreign metal clearance waste was reviewed to suggest the optimal recycling scenario for metal clearance waste that occurs the most when decommission nuclear power plants. Factors that can directly or indirectly affect the recycling of metal clearance waste were analyzed and evaluation criteria that can be used to evaluate optimal recycling measures were prepared. Using this, a scenario for recycling the optimal metal clearance waste suitable for the domestic environment was proposed. As a result of comparing/reviewing the importance of the first level of the evaluation criteria, public acceptance, national policy, and regulatory requirements were evaluated as the most important ones, and recycling acceptance and regulatory requirements were evaluated as the most important the second level of evaluation criteria. As a result of reviewing the clearance waste recycling scenario, it was evaluated that unrestricted recycling scenario was preferred. This may be because the survey subjects are composed of experts in the nuclear power field, so they know recycling of clearance waste in general industries does not significantly affect radiation safety. However even if it is clearance waste, the public may feel reluctant to recycle just because it was discharged from nuclear power plants, so policy and institutional improvements are needed to reassure the public along with the scientific safety of clearance waste. In addition, in order to improve public acceptance, it seems necessary to prepare specific measures to ensure the participation of public in the entire decommissioning process, share related information, and disclose all routes from generation to disposal of decommissioning waste. Considering that research on domestic clearance waste recycling options has not been activated, this study is significant in that it derives a scenario for recycling metal clearance waste that can be implemented. Also, it is expected that the evaluation criteria derived from this study will be used significantly when establishing a radioactive waste management strategy.