Colloid migration is an important topic in post-closure safety assessment of radioactive waste repository as radionuclide can be adsorbed onto colloidal particles and migrated along with the colloids. This would reduce retardation of radionuclide migration, thus increasing the released concentration into biosphere. Recently, glass fiber waste has been found to contain small sized crushed glass fiber particles (GFPs), and concerns regarding the colloidal impact of GFP is being discussed. In this study, relevance of assessing GFPs facilitated radionuclide transport in the disposal environment of 1st phase disposal facility. Colloidal impact assessment can be divided into two sections, colloid mobility, and colloid sorption assessments. Considering GFP being denser than water, fluid velocity of 1st phase disposal facility is too slow to initiate movement of such dense particles. GFPs would remain settled, and no colloidal impact is expected. In this study, sorption assessment mainly focused to analyze the possible impact if migration of GFP does occur. The GFP is mainly composed of SiO2 and few other metal oxides. Due to high composition of SiO2 in the GFPs, negative surface charge is induced onto the surface of the GFPs in alkaline environment. This negatively charged surface can attract free positive ions (ex. Ni, Co, Fe, etc.) in the repository, and these ions would be adsorbed onto the surface of the GFPs via coulomb force. Thus, if GFPs migrate, colloid facilitated radionuclide transport can be expected. However, before being released into the biosphere, particles must pass through the engineered and natural barriers, where ion-colloid-rock interactions could result in transfer of radionuclide from one media to another. At Naka Research Center, Japan, ion-colloid-rock interactions are experimented with bentonite colloid, and the result showed that despite colloid’s sorption ability was 10 times higher than the barrier material, the overall released radionuclide concentration has negligible change. To reflect such phenomenon, coulomb attractive force of GFPs and concrete is calculated and compared, which the result showed that glass fiber was 10 times weaker than concrete. Considering the Japan’s experimental result, glass fiber facilitated transport would not enhance the radionuclide release into the biosphere. Nonetheless, assuming GFPs being mobile in 1st phase disposal facility, GFPs’ sorption ability is found to be negligible compared to the concrete of the repository, thus radionuclide transport is not expected to be enhanced. In future, this study could be used as basis for further colloidal impact analysis for the safety assessment of the repository.

Glass fiber, which was used as an insulation material in pipes near the steam generator system of nuclear power plants, is brittle and the size of crushed particles is small, so glass fiber radioactive waste (GFRW) can cause exposure of workers through skin and breathing during transport and handling accidents. In this study, Q-system which developed IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) for setting the limit of radioactivity in the package is used to confirm the risk of exposure due to an accident when transporting and handling GFRW. Also, the evaluated exposure dose was compared with the domestic legal effective dose limit to confirm safety. Q-system is an evaluation method that can derive doses according to exposure pathway (EP) and radioactivity. Exposure doses are calculated by dividing into five EP: QA, QB, QC, QD, and QE. Since the Q-system is used to set the limit of radioactivity that the dose limits is satisfied to nearby workers even in package handling accidents, the following conservative assumptions were applied to each EP. QA, QB are external EP of assuming complete loss of package shielding by accident and radiation are received for 30 minutes at 1 m, QC is an internal EP that considers the fraction of nuclides released into the air and breathing rate during accident, and QD is an external EP that skin contamination for 5 hours. Finally, QE is an internal and external EP by inert gases (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn) among the released gaseous nuclides, but the QE pathway was excluded from the evaluation because the corresponding nuclide was not present in the GFRW products used for evaluation. In this study, the safety evaluation of GFRW was performed package shielding loss and radioactive material leakage due to single package accident according to assumption of four pathways, and the nuclide information used the average radioactivity for each nuclide of GFRW. As a result of the dose evaluation, QA was evaluated as 2.73×10−5 mSv, QB as 1.06×10−6 mSv, QC as 7.53×10−3 mSv, and QD as 2.10×10−6 mSv, respectively, and the total exposure dose was only 7.56×10−3 mSv, it was confirmed that when compared to the legal limits of the general public (1 mSv) and workers (20 mSv) 0.756% and 0.038%, respectively. In this study, it was confirmed that the legal limitations of the general public and workers were satisfied evens in the event of an accident as a result of evaluating the exposure dose of nearby targets for package shielding loss and radioactive material leakage while transporting GFRW. In the future, the types of accidents will be subdivided into falling, fire, and transportation, and detailed evaluation will be conducted by applying the resulting accident assumptions to the EP.