본고는 林養正(1716-1777)의 문집인 『수분와집』을 텍스트로 하여, 그의 생애와 가학을 계승하고 실천한 양상을 살피는 데 목적이 있다. 『守分窩集』은 별도의 목차 없이 그의 지향을 밝힌 문장인 ｢守分窩 序｣와 관련 기록 부분, 시편과 간찰을 모아놓은 부분, 家狀 관련 부분 등의 세 부분으로 구성되어 있다. 임양정은 남명학파의 학자였던 임진부(1586-1658)의 후손으로, 三嘉 지역의 학풍을 이끌어나가는 지역 명문가 출신이다. 어린 나이에 부친과 조부를 여의었으나 평생 충과 효를 실천하는 삶을 살았고, 가학 을 잇는 것을 본연의 임무로 받아들였다. 이는 성현이 남긴 文義를 명확히 이해하는 것으로, 이를 후학에게 자신이 터득한 문의를 정확히 전수 하는 방식으로 실현되었다. 아울러 가학의 전수는 임진부의『禮略』을 실천하여 誠禮의 정신을 체득하는 것으로 실현되었다. 이를 실질적으로 적용시켜 선조의 가훈을 誠孝와 公正이라는 정신으로 확립시켰다. 임양정의『수분와집』은 남명학파의 한 지파인 임곡 임진부의 후손이 향촌의 명문가로 자리 잡으면서 선조의 가훈을 어떻게 현실에서 구현시켰고 윤리규범으로 작용하였는가 보여주는 귀중한 자료라 할 수 있다.

A legal purposes of ‘Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name’ and ‘Act on the real name financial transaction’-currently being implemented revised on November 29-reason for the amendment, and when you see ‘Real Estate Real Name Registration Act’ Article 3 paragraph 1, From the premise that change is invalid lend the name of the property to another person and its rights under the contract, a review is needed for the attitude of the Supreme Court judgment that character to keep the heir’s about the person registered as the owner of the property. In other words, between actual owners and heirs of the estate are kept relationship based on trust each other is not permitted. Therefore, even if the heir to the disposal of real estate or deny the return embezzlement is not true. And as others have to borrow the name agreement and its premise the No. 2 Article 8 of this law will see a change in the rights of a valid, If the spouse who is the spouse parties who trustee is a fiduciary relationship ended by killing, whether civil, even people who trustee and fiduciary arrangements remain in full force and effect between the heir to Article 187 of one trustee of a trust estate by acquiring the rights, the fiduciary relationship and analysis for the presence, And if you refuse to return the heirs of those who trustee on the basis of this judicial discretion, trustees who are required to take and interpret whether civil remedies in any way for the preservation of the property of the trust estate. Moreover, this interpretation is that the same legal principles to be applied even if the disappearance or death or divorce of a marriage partner relationships cancellation of either spouse. The Supreme Court has interpreted to establish a trust relationship for the heirs of the people who destroyed fiduciary trustees who have a partner relationship. However, as the interpretation of the Court of Appeals after a valid contract between the couple if the spouse who trust relationship has ended, In particular, because the people who trustee if the trustee is not recognized, the murder of people who trust relationship between the heirs and trustees who trustee, Even if the heirs of the people trustee disposes of the trust estate, or even arbitrarily refuse to return embezzlement is reasonable to interpret that which is not true.