본 연구의 목적은 웨슬리 설교에 나타난 ‘love’를 포함하는 표현들을 분석하고, 이에 대한 교육적 시사점을 찾는 데에 있다. 이를 위하여 죤 웨슬리의 설교 중에 20편이 선정되었다. 콘코던스 프로그램은 AntConc 3.2.0w이 사용되었다. 설교들로부터 워드리스트가 추출되었고, ‘love’ 단어를 포함한 표현들을 조사하였다. 결과로는, 199개의 표현이 발견되었고, 그 연어들의 특징적인 부분을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 학습자들로 하여금 연어적 지식을 발전시키는 데에 도움을 줄 수 있으며, 영어학습에 있어서 어휘를 확장시킬 수 있게 해 준다. 학습자들은 또한 교수자의 지도하에 스스로 코퍼스 프로그램을 이용할 수도 있겠다.

이 서평은 위의 3작가의 작품을 최근 아일랜드 소절의 중심적 작품으로 본다.

이 논문은 예이츠부부가 결혼 초기에 실시했던 자동기술의 상당부분이 매우 개인적이며 성적인 내용으로 이루어져 있는 점에 주목하면서, 그러한 성적인 내용들이 자동기술에 어떻게 표현되어 있으며, 그것들은 자동기술에 표현되어 있는 철학적이고 종교적인 내용들과 어떤 관련성을 갖고 있는가, 또한 자동기술이 『비전』으로 엮어지는 과정에서 그러한 사적이고 성적인 내용들이 감추어지게 된 이유는 무엇이며, 그것들은 예이츠의 삶과 시에 어떤 영향을 주게 되는가에 대해 살피고 있다.

본 연구는 한국사회에서 최근 급격히 증가하고 있는 국제결혼여성들에 대하여 미디어가 어떻게 재현하고 있으며, 이러한 점들을 수용자들은 어떤 의미로 해독하고 있는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 우리사회에서 가장 대중적 소구력을 지닌 텔레비전 프로그램 중, 공영방송 KBS가 제작한 <러브 인 아시아>를 분석하였다. 또한 수용자 연구를 위해 2009년 12월부터 2010년 2월까지 방영된 프로그램 12편을 선정하여, 프로그램의 포맷과 내용들을 살펴보고, 실험연구를 통해 수용자들의 반응과 함께 그 의미를 파악하고자 하였다. 연구결과, 이 프로그램은 국제결혼여성을 초창기 방영분보다 ‘능력 있는 이주여성’, ‘가정에서 꼭 필요한 존재로서의 여성’으로 재현함으로써 인종주의적 타자성을 강화하고 있다. 더불어 이주여성의 현재의 삶과 과거 고향에서 삶의 체험현장의 재현을 통해 이산인의 문제를 제기하여 공론화하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 하지만 이산의 아픔에 대해 운명적 사랑으로 극복하는 낭만적인 멜로드라마식 이야기로 전개하는 방식은 이산의 문제를 올바르게 인식시키는데 장애가 되고 있음을 확인하였다. 또한 이산인에 대한 올바른 ‘정체성’의 재현을 위해 오락적 요소를 배제하고 객관적으로 접근함으로써 프로그램의 진정성과 신뢰도를 제고할 수 있음을 발견하였다. 한편 수용자들은 이 프로그램의 진실성, 기획의도에 대한 적절성, 이산인에 대한 친근감을 비교적 긍정으로 평가하고 있으며, 이산인의 ‘정체성’에 대해서도 그동안 자신들의 편견에 대한 반성과 인식변화의 필요성을 제기하는 등 선의적 시각을 보이고 있었다. 따라서 이산이라는 사회적 이슈를 이해하고 포옹하는 소통의 장으로서 텔레비전 프로그램의 활용 가능성을 재인할 수 있었다.

The relationship between Yeats and Gonne seems to show an example of the traditional courtly love. Courtly love was a medieval Europe conception of nobly and chivalrously expressing love and admiration. Under this relationship, although a male expresses the devotional love to a female, a woman shows no love and pity for a man and a woman is an object who uplifts a man's spirit. This relationship may be said to show the man's fear of castration. The relationship between Yeats and Gonne starts by his admiration for her beauty and sternness as a nationalist for the Irish Independence. Also, he glorifies her as a secret being. Moreover, Yeats's love for her shows the doubleness: erotic and spiritual, humane and transcendental, and humiliating and proud. However, Gonne's coldness leads Yeats to desperation. And the last step shows Yeats's fear of castration for the politically-minded Maud Gonne. In Rose, there is Yeats's admiration for the secret woman, Maud Gonne. Yeats's unrequited love leads finally to desperation and sorrow for love, facing Gonne‘s unwavering coldness as a nationalist, which leads Yeats to give her up, showing a kind of fear of castration.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the theme of The Only Jealousy of Emer, one of W. B. Yeats's 'Cuchulain plays'. The central action of the play is the struggle of three women—Emeer, Eithne Inguba and Fand—for possession of Cuchulain. Unlike Eithne Inguba's confused, cowardly action, Emer's behavior is brave as well as insightful. And as the chorus suggests, Fand's allurements are transitory. Fand's metallic allurement contrasts with Emer's passionate suffering. Fand wants to catch him to fulfill herself, not to aid in his salvation. Emer is more courageous than Eithne Inguba, more self-sacrificing than Fand, and more forgiving than Aoife. Emer's love for her husband transfigures her, whereas Aoife's vindictive hatred for Cuchulain costs them their only child. Emer is certainly a Yeatsian heroine who performs as nobly as Deirdre or Cuchulain. Yeats's most immediate source for his Cuchulain plays was Lady Gregory's Cuchulain of Muirthemne, but he significantly altered the source to serve his purposes. Emer's thwarted desire to attack Fand with her knife is one of the few links between Yeats's source and his much changed finished work of art. From this primitive tale of vengeance and jealousy, Yeats created a sophisticated drama of mental suffering and self-sacrifice. A second major change in the source involves Cuchulain's recollection of Fand's attempt to ensnare his soul. Both his fear upon awakening and his later praise of Emer for saving him suggest that he is glad of his deliverance, not despondent over the loss of Fand. Yeats's greatest modification came in his treatment of Emer's temperament. Instead of the jealous wife of seeking vengeance for herself, she is jealous only for her husband's well-being. By renouncing the love of the man she needs to end her loneliness, Emer proves herself superior to the source heroine. In the final version, Yeats dramatized, through Emer's hope for the return of Cuchulain's love for her, through her initial inability to give up her hope of winning back his love, and through her final renunciation of his love, the depth of her love and the extent of her sacrifice.

《Hidden love and T"aohuayan》 is a theatrical performance, it is a parody of the Chinese classical piece 《T"aohuayanji》. This work is considered to be the most representative Contemporary play of Lai Sheng Chun(賴聲川) who is a well -known Taiwanese director.<BR> Through this work, we can see that a parody of the Chinese classical pieces can be used to practice the technique of creating contemp. art.<BR> Reinterpretation about classical pieces can ensure the vitality of recreating only when an abjective condition is satisfied, that it is akind of freedom, being able to use the modern thinking faculties and a material foundation on the whole.<BR> Through a critical analyzation of Wulingt"aoyuan(The peach blossom land in Wuling; 武陵桃源) and 《T"aohuayanji; 桃花源記》 (《A record of the peach blossom land》 which are regarded as Oriental Utopia, I tried to look into anti-intellect influenced by the Chinese traditional thinking.

The last century saw three great poets: Yeats, Eliot, and Stevens. They each had created new poems different from the previous ones. The current topic finds Eliot most discordant from the other two, who has started from Romantic poetics. By "Romantic" I mean that the poet grew out of Romantic poetics and/or is Romantic temperamentally. In Eliot's case, because of his stance on Romanticism and his educational background, unfortunately, both poets and scholars have been blinded to the fact that Eliot is deeply Romantic, stylistically and temperamentally. Read any portion of any poem by Eliot; it is there in the very poem, such as "Prufrock." It indeed is a good poem, witty and modern. But the drawback with Eliot is he is exclusive, thus the poetic range is limited. Compared with him, Stevens is a pure Romantic, who profoundly succeeds in renewing Romantic poetics in modern times, as evidenced in "Sunday Morning." Which is the counterpoint to Milton's "Paradise Lost." Of course, in terms of poetic gestures. Yeats is, compared with Eliot and Stevens, unique. He is against science, and goes back to myths and folklore and man. His "Long-legged Fly" is the epitome of his great poetics, a victory over the materialistic society of last century. Still, it is hard to understand how he could go over what seems to have been an impossible barrier, with such an outmoded thing, as mysticism, mythology, Romanticism, that all thought dead.