논문 상세보기

진술거부권 불고지로 인한 위법수집증거 배제와 그 불복방법 KCI 등재

The right to remain silent and Exclusionary Rule

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/273083
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
刑事判例硏究 (형사판례연구)
한국형사판례연구회 (Korean Association of Criminal Case Studies)
초록

The right to remain silent is a basic right of the defendant or suspect guaranteed by the constitution and criminal procedure law. It is important to notify the right to the defendant or suspect so that he can excercise the right properly and effectively. It is appropriate to exclude the statement made by the suspect if the Miranda right notice is not given to him. However, once the police officer give the Miranda warning to the suspect, the statement after the notice can be admissible by the purged taint exception rule except that the officer abuse the rule. In addition to that, even if there is a breach of notification, the real evidence should be admissible. It is because the purpose of Miranda rule is to protect the statement not the real evidence. According to newly revised Korean Criminal Procedure Code, the range of exclusion can be interpreted very widely. However, we must be careful when we apply the rule to the real case in order to seek the balance between the human rights and social safety.

목차
[대상판결] 서울고등법원 2008. 11. 20.선고 2008노1954 판결(강도)
  Ⅰ. 사 안
  Ⅱ. 1심 법원의 판단
  Ⅲ. 2심 법원의 판단
 〔연 구〕
  Ⅰ. 서 론
  Ⅱ. 피의자의 자백의 증거능력 여부
  Ⅲ. 나○○의 진술
  Ⅳ. 증 거 물
  Ⅴ. 증거판단에 대한 불복방법
  Ⅵ. 결 론
  [참고문헌]
  [Abstract]
저자
  • 안성수(대검찰청 검찰연구관, 부부장검사, 법학박사, 뉴욕주 변호사) | An, Seong-Su