논문 상세보기

세 가지 기능적 자세에서 만성발목불안정성의 대상자와 정상인의 대둔근과 중둔근 보상적 근활성도 비교 KCI 등재

A Comparison of Compensatory Muscle Activation of Gluteus Maximus and Gluteus Medius in Subjects With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability During Three Functional Postures

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/289955
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
초록

The purpose of this study was to compare the change in electromyography (EMG) activity in the gluteus maximus (G-max) and the gluteus medius (G-med) in subjects with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI) during three functional postures. Twenty four females were recruited for this study. Subjects were assigned into two groups: with CAI (n1=12) and without CAI (n2=12). The assessment postures were rotational squat, one leg stand above a gradient and crossed leg-sway. Electromyographic activities of the G-max and the G-med were recorded using surface EMG and was normalized using the maximal voluntary isometric contraction elicited using a manual muscle testing. Independent t-test was used to determine the statistical differences between two groups during the three functional postures. The comparisons of the three posture between two groups were performed using a one-way repeated analysis of variance. A Bonferroni adjustment used for post hoc analysis. The activation of EMG on G-max performing the one leg stand above a gradient and crossed leg-sway in subjects with CAI is significantly higher than normal group (p<.05). The activation of EMG on the G-max during the rotational squat was significantly increased, compared to those of the one leg stand above a gradient and crossed leg-sway (p<.05). The activation of EMG on G-med performing three exercise at CAI is significantly higher than normal group (p<.05). The activation of EMG on the G-med during the crossed leg-sway was significantly increased, compared to the rotational squat (p<.05). This study provides valuable information for clinician who research CAI.

목차
Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 연구방법
  1. 연구대상자
  2. 측정도구 및 방법
  3. 평가 자세
  4. 분석방법
 Ⅲ. 결과
 1. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성
 2. 평가 자세에 따른 대둔근의 근활성도 비교
 Ⅳ. 고찰
 Ⅴ. 결론
 References
저자
  • 오희주(대전대학교 자연과학대학 물리치료학과) | Oh, Hee-Joo
  • 김미선(대전대학교 자연과학대학 물리치료학과) | Kim, Mi-Sun
  • 최종덕(대전대학교 자연과학대학 물리치료학과) | Choi, Jong-Duk