논문 상세보기

다중지능이론에 기초한 학습지도안이 일부 초등학생의 영양교육에 미치는 효과 KCI 등재

The Effect of Nutrition Education based on Theory of Multiple Intelligence in Elementary School Students

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/293835
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국식품영양학회지 (The Korean Journal of Food And Nutrition)
한국식품영양학회 (The Korean Society of Food and Nutrition)
초록

The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of nutrition education on elementary school students based on the theory of multiplex intelligence. Of the 56 elementary school students that participated in this survey, 37 (66.0%) had no siblings. The number of students whose mothers had jobs and those whose mothers did not work were 37 (67.9%) and 18 (32.1%), respectively. Food consumption with ordinary diets was normal in 23 students (41.1%) and the average frequency of snack intake and eating-out was determined to be twice a day (41 students, 73.2%) and once or twice per week (36 students, 64.3%), respectively. The most popular type of food consumed when eating-out was ‘fast foods’ in 28 students (50.0%). It was determined that on average, 39 students (69.6%) snacked between lunch and dinner time and 31 (55.4%) selected snacks based on information obtained through ‘mass media’. Analysis of the effects of nutrition education revealed an increase in the number of correct answers to the question ‘foods with high nutritional value are high calorie foods,’ with significant difference, but not in other questionnaires. In addition, the correct information for calcium (p<.05), good dietary habits (p<.001), food poisoning (p<.05), and six groups of nutrients in foods (p<.001) improved after nutrition education, with significant differences. As a result, the ratio of correct answers increased after nutrition education, with a significant difference (p<.001). After the education, the experimental group had a higher total score than the control group, with significant difference (p<.01).

목차
 서 론  연구방법   1. 조사대상   2. 조사내용 및 방법   3. 대조군, 실험군의 교수․학습 지도안 및 학습도구   4. 통계분석  결과 및 고찰   1. 일반적 특성   2. 식습관   3. 영양지식 평가   4. 영양교육 전․후 영양지식 평가   5. 교육 전․후 평점 비교  요약 및 결론  References
저자
  • 이인이(동덕여자대학교 식품영양학과) | Lee, In-Yi
  • 이제혁( 공주대학교 식품과학부) | 이제혁
  • 김명희( 공주대학교 식품과학부) | 김명희