creative innovation and an innovative problem-solving of industrial companies can be achieved by overcoming the challenges of technical and physical contradictions. The approaches to address conflicting and paradoxical problems, such as technical and physical contradictions have a crucial role in advancing the quality assessment for manufacturer and service provider. The term, technical contradiction, depicts the state that improvement of one ends of IFR (Ideal Final Result) leads to unfavorable condition of the other ends, and results in conflicting problem. Another type of contradictions that’s discussed in this study is a physical contradiction which is due to two mutually opposing states of the means of ends, and gives paradoxical situation.
By integrating the means-ends chain perspectives, the physical contradiction that is a specifically root-causes, “means”, can be initially addressed to resolve the downstream problem of technical contradiction which represents a general and abstract goals, “ends”. This research suggests IFR resolution processes to handle both physical contradiction of means and technical contradiction of ends by employing causal relationship with IFR, effects and causes.
n summary, the study represents three major processes that resolve such contradictions are demonstrated as follows: 1) Derivation of causal and hierarchical relationship among IFR, ends and means by considering CAED (Cause-And-Effect Diagram) and LT (Logic Tree). 2) Identification of causal relationship between physical contradiction and technical contradiction by using TPCT (TRIZ Physical Contradiction Tree) and TCD (Technical Contradiction Diagram). 3) Application of integrated TRIZ principles by classifying 40 inventive principles into 4 general conditions of the separation principle of mutually opposite states in space, in time, based on conditions, and between the parts and the whole. In order to validate the proof of proposed IFR resolution processes, the analysis of the TRIZ case studies from National Quality Circle Contest in the years, 2011 to 2014 have been proposed. The suggested guidelines that are built based on TRIZ principles can uniquely enhance the process of quality innovation and assessment for quality practitioners.

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. 특성요인도와 로직트리를 이용한 TRIZ모순트리 작성방안
  2.1 TRIZ의 물리적 모순과 기술적 모순
  2.2 TPCT에 의한 IFR 해결프로세스
 3. TRIZ 4가지 분류원칙과 40가지 발명원리의 통합방안
 4. 국가품질분임조 경진대회 TRIZ분야 사례분석
  4.1 조사대상 사례기업의 특성
  4.2 TRIZ 사례분석
  4.3 Case #1∼Case #6 사례분석
  4.4 Case #7∼Case #11 사례분석
  4.5 Case #12∼Case #17 사례분석
  4.6 Case #18∼Case #21 사례분석
  4.7 Case #22∼Case #26 사례분석
  4.8 사례에서 적용된 TRIZ 통합기법의 특징
 5. 결론
 6. References

• 최성운(가천대학교 산업공학과) | Sung-woon Choi Corresponding Author