논문 상세보기

Comparison of catches and species composition for flounders caught using gillnets, gillnets with supporting lines, and trammel nets KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/327698
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,200원
수산해양기술연구 (Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology)
한국수산해양기술학회(구 한국어업기술학회) (The Korean Society of Fisheriers and Ocean Technology)
초록

To compare the catches made using gillnets, trammel nets, and gillnets with supporting lines, several experiments were conducted with commercial vessels near Uljin and Pohang in Eastern Korea between July 2010 and May 2011. Two sets of 13 different nets were used, including 5 panels of gillnets and trammel nets each with stretched mesh sizes of 7.6, 9.1, 10.6, 12.1, and 13.6 cm and 3 panels of gillnets with a mesh size of 9.1 cm with supporting lines with different line spacing. The outer (stretched) mesh size of the trammel nets measured 51.5 cm. The target fishes of the fishing nets were various types of flounders. The catch rate of flounders was 50.7% of the total catch in weight. The total catch for all nets was 443.8 kg. The predominant species was pointhead flounder (Cleisthenes pinetorum). The total catch by trammel nets was 1.4 times that of the comparable gillnets. But more pointhead flounder were caught by gillnets than by trammel nets, though there was no significant difference. Fishermen catching the pointhead flounder in Korea said that there was no need to use trammel net to catch it; this was an unexpected finding compared to the findings of other flounder fisheries. The amounts of roughscale sole, brown sole, and blackfin flounder caught by trammel nets were greater than those caught by gillnets. The mean lengths (standard deviation) of blackfin flounder, pointhead flounder, brown sole, and roughscale sole were 21.0 (4.57), 22.9 (3.40), 24.7 (4.90), and 28.3 (5.43) cm, respectively; there were significant differences in mean length (p < 0.00001). Therefore, in order to catch flounder efficiently, the fishing nets and mesh size should be chosen according to the target species. One advantage of using supporting lines is that it prevents breakage by strengthening the material especially when utilized on a rough bottom. Catch by using gillnet with supporting lines was not greater than that by using trammel net for the conservation of fisheries resources.

저자
  • Hae-Hoon PARK(Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Korea) Corresponding author
  • Russell B. MILLAR(Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)
  • Chang-Doo PARK(Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Korea)
  • Seong-Wook PARK(Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Korea)
  • Sung Il LEE(Fisheries Resources Management Division, NFRDI, Busan 619-705, Korea)
  • Bong-Seong BAE(Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Korea)
  • Heui-Chun AN(Aquaculture Industry Division, East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Gangwon-do 210-861, Korea)
  • Sam-Kwang CHO(Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Korea)
  • Kyounghoon LEE(Fisheries System Engineering Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Korea)