논문 상세보기
실행의 착수와 구성요건 실현을 위한 '직접적인' 전 단계행위 KCI 등재
The direct action of pre-stage to fulfilling Actus reus and start to doing crime
In the case of illegal drug trafficking, regarding whether to acknowledge the undertaking action of illegal drug trafficking when the person only have received the payment, however, have not yet possessed or obtained the drug, it is not appropriate to acknowledge starting to doing crime. Merely, the person received the payment according to the contract of sale, at least it is possible to acknowledge the undertaking action of drug trafficking crime. In other words, it is problematic that whether this level of action is preparation stage of crime or is relevant to attempting crime. If the person already signed the contract of sale, it can be seen as the direct action of configuration requirement not as the action of preparation stage. Regarding an indecent assault, if someone tried to hug the victim with the intention of harassment within the distance of 1m with the victim, even though there was no physical contact, this has proximity in time/place with actus reus of actual crime. Without the intermediate intervention action, it may be considered as action that is possible to directly fulfill actus reus. According to the crime plan of a person, he/she is about to hug and assault the victim. Action of raising hand to hug the victim is the last stage of actus reus which other intermediate intervention action is not needed. Therefore, attempted indecent assault is considerable.
1. 대법원 2015. 3. 20. 선고 2014도16920 판결
(1) 사실관계
(2) 하급심의 판단
(3) 대법원의 판단
2. 대법원 2015. 9. 10. 선고 2015도6980 판결
(1) 사실관계
(2) 하급심 법원의 판단
(3) 대법원의 판단
Ⅱ. 문제의 제기
Ⅲ. 실행의 착수에 대한 일반적 판단 기준
1. 객관설
2. 주관설
3. 절충설
4. 검토
(1) 구성요건적 (일부)행위의 실행
(2) 구성요건 실현을 위한 ‘직접적인’ 전 단계행위
Ⅳ. 각 개별 구성요건에 따른 실행의 착수 판단
1. 마약매매행위와 실행의 착수
(1) 마약류 관리에 관한 법률 규정의 내용
(2) 마약류 매매행위에 대한 판례의 태도
(3) 독일의 경우
(4) 마약류 매매행위와 미수·기수시기
2. 강제추행행위와 실행의 착수
(1) 기습추행과 폭행·협박의 정도
(2) 독일의 경우
(3) 기습추행과 실행의 착수 판단
Ⅴ. 대상판결의 적용
1. 대상판결 1
2. 대상판결 2
Ⅵ. 마치며
[참고문헌]
[ABSTRACT]
