논문 상세보기

Interaction Effects of Lay Theories and Failure Type on Adaptive versus Compensatory Consumption Behavior KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/352426
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
산경연구논집 (JIDB) (산경연구논집)
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)
초록

Purpose - This paper aims at exploring the effects of failure types such as failure in promotion orientation and failure in prevention orientation on consumers' consumption behavior, and the moderation role of lay theories in the effects.
Research design, data, and methodology – This study employed 2 between-subject designs(failure in promotion orientation vs. failure in prevention orientation) and also 2 (failure in promotion orientation vs. failure in prevention orientation) with implicit self as the within-subject. Chinese consumers participated in the empirical study, and to verify the hypotheses ANOVA, T-test and regression analysis were used.
Results – Consumers were more likely to choose adaptive consumption behavior rather than compensatory consumption behavior when they were encountered with failure in promotion orientation versus failure in prevention orientation. Lay theories did play the moderation role in the effect of failure types on consumption behavior. The incremental theorists who think that effort is an important way to accomplish their learning goals showed more willingness to conduct compensatory consumption behavior rather than adaptive consumption behavior.
Conclusions – Marketers should put more attention on the ways by which their products can help consumers self-improve when consumers encounter with failure. They should also be aware of the importance of consumers' mindsets when designing and developing advertising messages.

목차
Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses
  2.1. Compensatory versus Adaptive ConsumptionBehavior
  2.2. Two Types of Failure Based on RegulatoryFocus Perspective
  2.3. Lay Theories
  2.4. Lay Theories, Failure Type and ConsumptionBehavior
 3. Empirical Analysis
  3.1. Pretest and Experimental Objects
  3.2. Study 1
  3.3. Study 2
 4. Discussion and Conclusion
  4.1. Research Summary
  4.2. Theoretical Implication
  4.3. Managerial Implication
  4.4. Limitations and Directions for Future Research
 References
저자
  • Nak-Hwan Choi(Department of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University)
  • Li Wang(Chonbuk National University)
  • Chang Chen(Doctoral Student, Chonbuk National University) Corresponding Author