논문 상세보기

Effect of Feeding Strategies on Milk Production of Holstein Dairy Cows Managed by Small-Farmers Alpine Grassland in Korea KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/357628
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국초지조사료학회지 (Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland Science)
한국초지조사료학회 (The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)
초록

The main objective of this experiment was to investigate effects of two different feeding systems on body weight, milk yield, milk composition, and mineral and fatty acids content of Holstein dairy cows’ milk. Sixteen of 25 months-old Holstein dairy cows were assigned to two groups (n=8) to study effects of the feeding system for 150 days. Two feeding systems were compared for five months; Group 1 was housed indoors and mainly fed a concentrate diet, Group 2 was maintained outdoors for five-seven hours/day on various kinds grass in a pasture. The experiment was conducted June-October 2017. Results revealed the indoor-fed cows had higher body weight, that was significant compared with the outdoor-based feeding system of Holstein dairy cows (p<0.05). Indoor-raised milking cows had higher milk yield (32.45 kg) as compared with pasture-raised milk yield (26.44 kg). Cows fed indoors significantly increased milk yield, total protein content, lactose, citric acid level, and lowered level of total solid and free fatty acids relative to the pasture-fed milking cows (p>0.05). There were higher levels of mineral content and fatty acid content in the milk of indoor-fed dairy cows than the pasture-raised dairy cows (p>0.05). Our study results demonstrated the potential benefits of the indoor feeding system for increased body weight, milk yield, mineral and fatty acids content summer through autumn when low pasture growth rates and quality may otherwise limit production.

목차
ABSTRACT
 Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
 Ⅱ. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  1. Experimental site and feeding system management
  2. Analysis of body weight, milk composition, milk mineral content of Holstein dairy cows
  3. Statistical analysis
 Ⅲ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Ⅳ. CONCLUSIONS
 Ⅴ. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 Ⅵ. REFERENCES
저자
  • Tae-Il Kim(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) Corresponding author
  • Vijayakumar Mayakrishnan(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Dong-HyunLim(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Seong-MinPark(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Ji-HooPark(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Sang-BumKim(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Jeong-SungJung(Grassland and Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Kwang-SeokKi(Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)