논문 상세보기

白川靜對“口”字系列字解釋的失誤舉隅 ——《白川靜“神聖漢字說”失誤(一)》續 KCI 등재

A Discussion on Shirakawa Shizuka’s Misinterpretation of Serial Characters of ‘Kou (口)’ by Exemplifying the Original Meaning of ‘Gao (告)’

백천정대"구"자계열자해석적실오거우 ——《백천정"신성한자설"실오 (일)》속

  • 언어CHI
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/364659
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,800원
漢字硏究 (한자연구)
경성대학교 한국한자연구소 (Center For The Study of Chinese Charaters in Korea, Kyungsung University)
초록

Shirakawa Shizuka recognizes the Chinese Character before the Warring States Period as a kind of sacred one which exists in a way of series. For example, he interpreted the meaning of ‘Kou (口)’ according to its structure prior to the Period, regarding the meaning as the symbolization of an instrument used for praying. Then, he thought all the Chinese Characters with the structure element of ‘Kou’ should belong to the sacred. But his recognition is not correct. First, the interpretation of ‘Kou’ as the prayer instrument with the prayer character is wrong. So, the interpretation of serial characters of ‘Kou’ based on his misinterpretation of ‘Kou’ also proves to be wrong. Second, except the abovementioned mistakes, Shirakawa Shizuka made some other mistakes in his research on the serial characters of ‘Kou’ as well. But in this paper, we will just take examples of the characters such as ‘Gao (告)’, ‘Yue (曰)’, and ‘Yan (言)’, to point out the mistakes.

목차
1. 引言
 2. 白川靜對“告”字解說的失誤
 3. 白川靜對“曰”、“言”、“音” 等字解說的失誤
 4. 結論
 References
 Abstract
저자
  • 連登崗(南通大學國學研究所、中國開放大學) | Denggang LIAN
같은 권호 다른 논문