Developed countries especially United States of America(USA) and Canada hadn't taken any Countervailing Measures(CVM) against China before 2004, because they regarded China as a non-market economy(NME) country, and they thought NME country didn't exist the market price, and it is difficult their to calculate or apply the CVM rate in NME country. But China was invoked by Canada and USA with anti-subsidies investigation since April 2004 still they regarded China as a non-market economy(NME) country. So this paper will mainly analyze the case concerning among China, USA and Canada anti-subsidies investigations against China in the Special Import Measures Act(SIMA) in Canada, United States Countervailing Duty Law(USCVD) in USA, WTO SCM Agreement, and discuss the substantive claims of contracting parties, and find the problems of Chinese subsidy system and Chinese granted' WTO SCM Agreement. Through these cases, Chinese government should adjust its domestic industrial system and subsidy system which will lead to international disputes especially prohibited subsidies.

1. 서론
 2. 중국의 WTO가입협정과 보조금
  2-1. WTO의 보조금 정의와 적용범위
  2-2. 중국의 WTO 가입 협정상의 보조금 조항
  2-3. 중국과 주요 교역대상국간 보조금 분쟁 주요쟁점
 3. 중국과 주요 교역국가간 보조금 분쟁사례
  3-1. 중국과 캐나다간 보조금 분쟁
  3-2. 중국과 미국간의 보조금 분쟁
 4. 중국의 보조금 관련 제문제
  4-1. WTO가입협정서상의 중국의 권리포기 문제
  4-2. 비시장국가에 대한 통상법 확대적용 문제
  4-3. 중국 국내의 보조금 체계상의 문제
 5. 결 론

• 권진택(진주산업대학교 전자상거래 무역학과) | Jintaek Kwon
• 손성문(진주산업대학교 전자상거래 무역학과) | Seongmun Son 교신저자