Concentrating on the non-musculoskeletal patients and revising the overall outlines of the phases recognizable in biomedical discourse, the present study investigated the linguistic phase markers that characterized the initial and the follow-up phases and the mini-phases in them, which added up to the characteristic major phases in Korean Oriental Medical discourse (KOMD). Focusing on the centripetal force of the patient’s constitution on KOMD, it proposed distinguishing an initial session from a follow-up session due to the weight on the former for identification of the patient’s constitution. Within the first session, the present study illustrated that the doctor adopted the non-proximal temporal expressions to mark the phase boundaries in an effort to identify the constitution. Such phase markers included habitual or iterative frequency expressions, distal temporal adverbials, experiential constructions without ‘recently’ or ‘nowadays,’ and the habitual present. Subsequently, the study turned to a follow-up session and demonstrated that the doctor adopted proximal temporal expressions in order to demarcate the phase boundaries. Such phase markers included proximal temporal expressions, the temporal adverbials that highlighted the difference between the pre- and post-treatment, and explicit comparatives and equatives. Consequently, the phase models revised for KOMD were in operation, structuring both the major phases and the mini phases in them around the patient’s biophysical, psychosocial, and reactional traits. That said, as Mishler’s (1984) study demonstrated, it worked as long as the interaction was doctor-centered. When the patient’s role in the phases was brought into light, however, the model would invite further revisions.

1. Introduction
 2. Medical Phase Models Revisited
 3. Data and Methodology
 4. Linguistic Phase Markers in the First Session
  4.1. Habitual or iterative frequency expressions
  4.2. Distal temporal adverbials
  4.3. Experiential constructions without ‘recently’ or ‘nowadays’
  4.4. Habitual present
 5. Linguistic Phase Markers in the Follow-Up Sessions
  5.1. Proximal temporal expressions
  5.2. The temporal adverbials that highlight the difference between thepre- and post-treatment
  5.3. Explicit comparatives and equatives
 6. Conclusion and Discussion
 References

• Ki-tae Kim(Keimyung University)