《朝鲜王朝实录》是韩国编年体汉文历史文献，记载了朝鲜王朝由始祖太祖至纯宗时代的27 代君主共519年（1392-1910）的历史事实。朝鲜王朝历时五百多年，受到中国明朝与清朝的巨大影 响，因此，《实录》里保存着双方各个方面的史料。这些史料来看，朝鲜时期的官僚文人对中国先 贤极为推崇，并频繁引用他们的诸多论断或诗文，来充当自己论述或文章的依据。而这其中，苏轼 是被引频率最高者之一，而其<上神宗皇帝书>几乎是朝鲜官僚人手必备的一篇名文。

‘The True Record of the Joseon Dynasty’ (1392-1863) is a historical document of the Joseon Dynasty which lasted 519 years with rulings of 27 kings in Korean history. This article examines this document to show how kings and bureaucrats of the Joseon Dynasty perceived works of Su Shi, a famous writer from the Song Dynasty. As a writer of the Song Dynasty, Su Shi had a negative view on the Goryeo Dynasty (918-1392) although his works were regarded as the best writings by the Goryeo and Joseon scholars. All the Joseon bureaucrats read and learnt Su Shi’s works. Naturally, the Joseon bureaucrats of the royal palace often cited Su Shi’s writings. Many of the Joseon bureaucrats memorized Su Shi’s “A suggestion recommendation to Shenzong Emperor.” This contained some details of bureaucrats’ suggestions to their emperor regarding state administration. For instance, one of the most cited phrase was that it was important duty of bureaucrats to raise their formal counsel to the emperor. Also, Su Shi was often cited when emphasizing the importance of various national events’ proceedings. Beside these, Su Shi’s view point and ideas had a great influence on Joseon bureaucrats. However, Since the Joseon Dynasty was the center of Neo-Confucianism, however, the idea of Su Shi was somewhat rejected. For this reason, some bureaucrats expressed their explicit objection against Su Shi’s works. On the contrary thinkers such as Wang Anshi and Zhu Xi, who were loyal to the kingship, were respected. It was found in this article that quotations of Wang Anshi and Zhi Xi were used much more frequent than Su Shi’s quotations in conversations between kings and their servants. In this regard, it can be said that the Joseon Dynasty bureaucrats knew about Su Shi’s works, but they had an antipathy toward his ideas.

【摘要】
1.《朝鲜王朝实录》概要
2.《朝鲜王朝实录》中的苏轼记事研究方法
3.《朝鲜王朝实录》中的苏轼记事类型
    1) 引用苏轼有关言官重要性的文章
    2) 引用苏轼对政策的意见
    3) 礼法上引用苏轼文章
    4) 对苏轼的非难或贬斥
    5) 其他相关情况
4.《朝鲜王朝实录》中的苏轼记事特征
【参考文献】
【논문초록】

• 安熙珍(檀國大學校 中國語科) | 안희진