The purpose of this paper is to identify a relative importance and priority of the factors of Competencies of project team member. It aims to present the differential competency factors from a differentiated perspective by applying the Leadership Development Questionnaire, which is the competency dimension required for manager, to team member. (1) Background: The diverse needs of customers and companies, and the uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, and volatility of the environment surrounding the company in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution threaten the survival of company. In this respect, companies should implement the project management approach and strive to increase the capabilities of each team member. (2) Methods: AHP method was used to prioritize which factors were considered more importance level and the gap of relative importance level between project manager group and team members group. (3) Results: In the analysis of the relative importance of the upper class, weights were derived in the order of managerial competence, intellectual competence, and emotional competence. The sub-factor that respondents prioritize was communication as the 1st priority, and it was analyzed in the order of strategic perspective, achieving, critical analysis and judgement, and vision and imagination. There were some differences in the ranking of the relative importance of achieving and vision and imagination attributes between the PM group and TM group, it was analyzed that there was no significant difference overall. (4) Implications: The results of this study confirmed the recognition that team members are required to have the same competencies as the project manager. And based on the priorities of the competencies required of team members, companies are expected to cultivate professional and competent team members, and expand the roles and authority of team members so that they can actively carry out projects.

1. 서 론
2. 이론적 배경
    2.1 프로젝트와 프로젝트 조직
    2.2 개인역량
    2.3 프로젝트 조직과 개인역량
    2.4. 계층적 의사결정분석(AHP)
3. 연구방법
    3.1 요인 및 계층구조화
    3.2 자료수집
4. 분석 결과
    4.1 표본의 인구통계학적 특성
    4.2 분석 결과의 신뢰성
    4.3 상위계층의 상대적 중요도 분석
    4.4 하위계층의 상대적 중요도 분석
    4.5 종합 우선순위 분석
    4.6 개인역량에 대한 PM과 TM간의 상대적 중요도Gap Analysis
5. 결 론
    5.1 연구결과 요약
    5.2 연구의 시사점 및 한계점
References

• Yeoungdae Kim(연세대학교 정경창업대학원) | 김영대
• Jinah Lee(한양대학교 경영학부) | 이진아
• Minjeong Oh(연세대학교 글로벌엘리트학부) | 오민정 Corresponding Author