The methodology classifying structural types of concrete buildings in the existing seismic fragility functions is too simple to estimate the fragility of existing residential buildings and neighborhood living facilities, especially those below five stories. Their structural types are dependent on information contained in the building register such as main use, total floor area, story, permission date, and first story floor area of the individual building. All of this information is not considered for classifying types in the existing functions; therefore, the goal of this study was to suggest a methodology that classifies structural types of concrete buildings by utilizing such information. The results of this study showed that the suggested methodology can classify structural types better than the existing methodology. Nevertheless, there is still a need to simplify the methodology because fragility estimation demands quickness rather than accuracy.

A B S T R A C T
1. 서 론
2. 주거용 건물의 종류
3. 건축물대장 분석
4. 콘크리트구조 유형 분류 방안
    4.1 기존 분류 방식의 미비점
    4.2 유형 분류 기준 제안
    4.3 유형 분류 흐름도
5. 콘크리트구조 유형 분류 사례
    5.1 필로티가 있는 전단벽 구조(C5)
    5.2 전단벽 구조(C3)
    5.3 전단벽이 있는 모멘트골조(C4)
    5.4 무보강조적벽이 있는 모멘트골조(C2)
6. 결 론
REFERENCES

• 김태완(강원대학교 건축토목환경공학부) | Kim Taewan (Department of Architectural, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University) Corresponding author