논문 상세보기

Combination Pharmacological Interventions for Smoking Cessation and Post-Cessation Weight Gain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/404166
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,800원
대한작업치료학회지 (Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy)
대한작업치료학회 (Korean Society Of Occupational Therapy)
초록

Objective: Limited evidence exists concerning whether combined pharmacotherapy is more effective than monotherapy for increased smoking abstinence and post-cessation weight gain prevention. This research investigated the effect of combined pharmacotherapy on smoking abstinence and post-cessation weight change.
Methods: A meta-analytic review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and July 2016 was conducted across PubMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Aggregate fixed effects were estimated for continuous abstinence and mean post-cessation weight change. Keyword search terms included: “smoking cessation,” “naltrexone”, “varenicline”, and “bupropion”.
Results: Eight RCTs with 2,513 participants were included. Aggregate fixed effect estimates revealed an increase in continuous smoking abstinence (OR = 1.81, p < .001) and mean decrease in post-cessation weight change (-.15 kg, p = .001). Decreased weight change was observed at 6-8 weeks follow-up (-.14 kg, p = .02). Increased mean weight change was observed among varenicline plus nicotine patch abstainers (.21 kg, p = .01), whereas bupropion plus NRT pharmacotherapies showed decreased mean weight change (-.15 kg, p = .01).
Conclusion: Combination pharmacotherapy generates increased smoking abstinence and small short-term post-cessation weight change among abstainers, particularly among bupropion plus NRT when compared against varenicline plus nicotine patch.

목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Materials and methods
    1. Data sources and study selection
    2. Training and reliability
    3. Data extraction
    4. Statistical analysis
    5. Publication bias
Ⅲ. Results
    1. Characteristics of included studies
    2. Main effects
    3. Subgroup analyses
Ⅳ. Discussion
    1. Implications for occupational therapy
References
저자
  • Gail Castañeda(Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida) Corresponding author
  • Jaewon Kang(Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Without Compensation Positions (WOC))
  • Mi Jung Lee(Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Without Compensation Positions (WOC), Division of Rehabilitation Science, University of Texas Medical Branch)
  • Nancy Schaefer(Health Science Center Libraries, University of Florida, University Librarian)
  • Sergio Romero(Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System)