A Study on the Analysis of New HSK Level 2 and 3 Tests and Their Countermeasures
본 연구는 新HSK문법 등급에 제시된 문법 등급이 실제 기출문제에 어떻게 반영 되는지 알아보고, 그 대응방안을 찾는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해서 新HSK 출제기관 인‘汉办’에서 2015년 제시한 등급을 찾고, 2020년에 발행된 실제 기출문제 제1회차부 터 제5회차에서 해당 문법 등급을 찾은 후에, 서로 교차 대조하였다.본 연구 결과 2 급에서는 결과보어, 가능보어, 명량보어, 비교문, 겸어문, 전치사 등의 문법 등급에서 범위를 초과하였다. 3급에서는 결과보어, 방향보어, 가능보어, 명량보어, 비교문, 전치 사 등의 문법 등급에서 범위를 초과하였다. 이는 2급과 3급 문법 등급과 실제 기출 문제 사이에 일정한 편차가 있다는 것을 증명하는 것으로써, 新HSK 시험 지도에 많은 도움을 줄 수 있다. 향후, 등급별로 대조하는 것을 제안한다.
The purpose of this study is to find out how the grammar grade presented in the new HSK grammar grade is reflected in the actual previous questions and to find countermeasures. To this end, the ratings presented in 2015 by the new HSK Examination institution"汉办" were found, and the grammar grades were found from the first to fifth rounds of the actual questions published in 2020, and then cross-contrasted with each other. As a result of this study, the range of grammar grades such as The complement of result, The Potential complement, The complement of quantity, comparative sentence, pivotal Sentence, preposition, etc. was exceeded in grade 2. In Level 3, the range was exceeded in grammar grades such as The complement of result, The complement of direction, The Potential complement, The complement of quantity, comparative sentence, preposition. This proves that there is some difference between the new HSK grammar grade and the actual question, and which helps a lot in guiding the new HSK test.complement is a special sentence component in Chinese and often has a different order of words from Korean, which makes it difficult for learners. Therefore, instructors should particularly focus on the concept and word order of complement. In the future, other levels also propose follow-up studies on the agreement rate between the new HSK grammar grade and the actual question.