Firstly, since Jaryujuseok was exposed to the world, the Myeoknam edition has been known widely as the original edition. However, the details show that the Myeoknam edition is not the original edition. The most important evidence is that there are remarks from other one and the handwriting is the same. Seconedly, the texts are highly focused while the preface and appendix are ignored. We should pay more attention to them. For example, the auther cited Gaiyucongkao in a wrong way. Lastly, Jeongjo’s name, Seong, is recorded by Jaryujuseok. Jaryujuseok explained Seong in Korean for the first time. According to the explanation, we can make a conclusion that Seong means Review.

1. 緒論
2. 《字類注釋》版本新探 
    2.1 現今藏本實態之管窺
    2.2 覓南本非初本之證據 
3. 《字類注釋》總論新探
    3.1 總論關於《陔餘叢考》的引述
    3.2 總論關於諺文旁點的論述 
    3.3 總論關於漢語入聲的論述
    3.4 總論關於華音、東音的論述 
4. 《字類注釋》所收“祘”字新探 
    4.1 中土視域下的“祘”字 
    4.2 朝鮮視域下的“祘”字 
5. 餘論
References
Abstract

• 袁成(無錫職業技術學院) | Cheng YUAN