PURPOSES : The purpose of this study was to reduce greenhouse gases and prevent potholes on roads by evaluating the performances of hot and warm mixed asphalt mixtures.
METHODS : Quality tests were conducted using an appropriate aggregate ratio of the asphalt mixture. The tests for comparing the warm mixed asphalt mixture are the indirect tensile strength and toughness, Marshall stability and flow, tensile strength ratio, and dynamic immersion test. A performance evaluation was conducted using a mixture that satisfied the quality test results. A performance evaluation test was also conducted using the dynamic modulus and Hamburg wheel tracking test. To analyze the performance based on the amine content, the performance was compared with that of a hot mixed asphalt mixture.
RESULTS : All tests for the mixture results satisfied the standard values. The optimal amine content was analyzed through the high and low frequencies of the dynamic modulus test results and stripping inflection point with the final rut depth of the Hamburg wheel tracking test. The dynamic modulus test results demonstrated better crack resistance and plastic deformation when a high amine content ratio was used. The Hamburg wheel-tracking test showed water resistance and plastic deformation resistance. The test results of the Hamburg wheel tracking indicated better deformation resistance and water resistance when a high amine content ratio was used. CONCLUSIONS : The plastic deformation and crack resistance increased with an increase in amine content. Analysis of the comprehensive test revealed that the optimal amine content was between that of additives B(50%) and C(65%). Tests with a granular amine content are planned to confirm the specific components. Also planned are a simplified viscoelastic continuum damage test and a semicircular bending test to evaluate the performance better.

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
    1.1. 개요
2. 배합설계
    2.1. 일반가열 및 중온아스팔트 혼합물
    2.2. 아스팔트 혼합물의 공극률 시험 결과
    2.3. 중온화 첨가제별 성분
3. 품질시험
    3.1. 첨가제별 품질시험 내역
4. 동탄성계수 시험
    4.1. 시험개요
5. 함부르크 휠트래킹 시험
    5.1. 시험개요
6. 결론 및 향후 연구과제
REFERENCES

• 이창준(서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과 학사과정) | Lee Changjun
• 가현길(서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과 박사과정) | Ga Hyungil
• 박동일(㈜남흥 엔에이치케미칼(주) 부설연구소 차장) | Park Dongil
• 권영주(서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과 석사과정) | Kwon Youngju
• 문성호(서울과학기술대학교 공과대학 건설시스템공학과 정교수) | Mun Sungho Corresponding Author