The Korean tariff rate for fishery products is a single tax rate of 10% for live fish and frozen seafood, and 20% for all others. Since FTAs have been concluded with several countries, the tariffs is not an appropriate means to protect domestic fishery producers. The differential tariff rate according to the scientific name (genus) of the fishery products, which was implemented 30 years ago to protect fishery products produced in the Korean coastal waters has lost its original purpose. It seems that future fishery trade policy should focus on IUU prevention, hygiene and safety of consumers rather than protecting fishery producers through customs tariffs. This paper suggest that a paradigm shift in the fishery producers protection policies such as direct financial support from the state, protection and development of fishery resources, and support for fostering the 6th industry rather than indirect protection through tariffs.

Abstract
I. 서 론
Ⅱ. 수산물 품목분류와 HS 2022
    1. WCO 수산물 품목분류 체계
    2. HS 2022 도입에 따른 수산물 품목분류 변화
Ⅲ. 수산물의 품목분류 사례
    1. 도시디쿠스 기가스종 오징어 품목분류
    2. 플라스틱 용기에 넣은 냉동 새우 품목분류
Ⅳ. 시사점
Ⅴ. 결 론
REFERENCES

• 박민규(인하대학교 국제통상학과 교수) | Min-Gyu Park (Professor, Department of International Trade, Inha University) Corresponding author