논문 상세보기
pp.19-33
Recently, conservation and utilization of cultural heritage has been regarded as importance. So, various research papers about maintenance of the remains have been presented in many conferences. But most of researches have focused on introduction about maintenance methods and explanation about maintenance concepts of remains. And even in case of a few papers treated post-evaluation about maintenance of the remains the criteria of the evaluation has tended to somewhat subjective. So, the purpose of this study is to show the objective post-evaluation indexes which was developed by Delphi · AHP methods. This research was proceeded in two stages. First, we arranged the evaluation index in a hierarchy to be made through the analyses about references and researches about maintenance of remains. 304 evaluation articles were elicited through the process. And then, elicited evaluation articles were classified with 'conservation' and 'utilization'. Second step was to figure out importance and validity of hierarchical evaluation articles with twice questionnaire surveys. This research used interval scale to comprehend validity and AHP method to evaluate relative importance of each other articles.
1. 서 론
1-1. 연구 배경 및 목적
1-2. 선행 연구 조사
1-3. 연구의 방법
2. 평가 기법의 이론적 고찰
2-1. 델파이기법
2-2. AHP기법
3. 평가지표 체계 구성
3-1. 상위개념 도출
3-2. 하위개념 도출
3-3. 평가지표 체계 도출
4. 조사 결과 분석
4-1. 조사 연구 과정
4-2. 타당성 검토
4-3. 중요도 검토
4-4. 유적정비 사후 평가 지표
5. 맺음말
References
