논문 상세보기
pp.393-405
This study was conducted to select indicators for assessing national biodiversity. For this purpose, 140 biodiversity-related indicators were identified as a result of inventorying biodiversity-related indicators used in Korea and abroad, and when these indicators were applied to the pressure, status, and response indicator system, it was found that status indicators accounted for the largest number of indicators, with 29 pressure, 59 status, and 44 response. We also categorized the status indicators into genes, species, habitat, function, and quality, and found that species and habitat indicators accounted for the majority. Pressure indicators were categorized into direct exploitation, pollution, alien species, climate change, and habitat change. As a result, it was found that direct exploitation and pollution accounted for most of the pressure indicators. In addition, this study used internationally used indicator selection criteria to establish criteria for selecting domestic biodiversity assessment indicators. Using this list of indicators and indicator selection criteria, we evaluated the prioritization of domestically applicable biodiversity indicators through relevant expert consultations. 1) Vegetation class, 2) Land cover indicators, and 3) Change of protected area ranked highly. In fact, these indicators have been used in many studies due to the availability of assessable data. However, most of the highly scored indicators are based on ecosystem area, and further consideration of ecosystem functions and components (species) is needed.
국제기구 생물다양성 평가지표 현황 분석
1. 생물다양성협약 (CBD: Convention on BiologicalDiversity)
2. 생물다양성과학기구 (IPBES: IntergovernmentalPlatform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)
3. 북극 동식물보전 워킹그룹 (CAFF: Conservation ofArctic Flora and Fauna)
4. 람사르협약 (Ramsar Convention on Wetland)
평가지표 목록화 및 선정 기준 마련
1. 평가지표 목록화
2. 평가지표 선정 기준 마련
선정 지표의 국내 현황
결 론
REFERENCES
