Steel brace is a popular option among seismic rehabilitation methods for school buildings, but it has a weakness in that the section area must be large enough to prevent buckling, so stiffness and strength are highly increased locally, and foundation reinforcing is required. On the contrary, BRB has strength that the steel core may be negligible since buckling is restrained, so the increase of stiffness and strength is insignificant, and foundation reinforcing may not be required. This study compared the effectiveness of both reinforcing methods for the seismic performance of school buildings by conducting both pushover and nonlinear dynamic analyses. Steel brace and BRB reinforcing may not be satisfied by nonlinear dynamic analysis, even by pushover analysis. This result is due to the school buildings' low lateral resistance and high column shear strength ratio. Suppose BRB can be regarded as a general rehabilitation method. In that case, BRB reinforcing is a favorable and economical option for school buildings with low column shear strength ratio since it can better satisfy performance objectives than steel brace by pushover analysis with a small steel core and no foundation reinforcing.

A B S T R A C T
1. 서 론
2. 가새 보강을 학교 건물에 적용한 선행 연구
3. 대상 건물
    3.1 건물 형상
    3.2 기둥파괴 모드
    3.3 대상 건물 모델링
    3.4 철골 가새 및 BRB 비선형 모델
4. 푸시오버해석을 통한 철골 가새와 비좌굴가새보강 효과 비교
5. 비선형동적해석을 통한 철골가새와 비좌굴가새보강 효과 비교
6. 결 론
REFERENCES

• 이용근(강원대학교 에너지인프라 융합학과 대학원생) | Lee Yong Geun (Graduate Student, Department of Energy and Infra Integrated System, Kangwon National University)
• 김태완(강원대학교 에너지인프라 융합학과 교수) | Kim Taewan (Professor, Department of Energy and Infra Integrated System, Kangwon National University) Corresponding author