논문 상세보기

Assessing of Detection Efficiency and Diversity by Sampling Points or Sample Conditions in Lakes Using eDNA Metabarcoding: Focusing on Freshwater Bivalves KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/443085
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,200원
생태와 환경 (Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment)
초록

Freshwater bivalves contribute to key ecological functions in lake ecosystems, yet their cryptic and benthic lifestyles often hinder detection through conventional surveys. In this study, we applied environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to assess the diversity and distribution of unionid bivalves in six lakes across Republic of Korea. Water samples were collected from three sampling strategies-Center Surface, Center Mix, and Waterside Surface-and processed using 16S rDNA-targeted primers followed by high-throughput sequencing. A total of four unionid species (Cristaria plicata, Sinanodonta lauta, Unio (Nodularia) douglasiae, and Anodonta woodiana) were detected across 18 sampling points. Notably, eDNA successfully identified unionid presence in all lakes, even where conventional surveys failed to observe individuals. Among the sampling strategies, Center Mix exhibited the highest values for Shannon and Simpson indices as well as ASV richness. Waterside Surface samples generally showed lower diversity and detection frequency. A Venn diagram of ASV occurrences revealed three ASVs shared across all sampling strategies and one unique ASV found only in Center Mix. These results indicate that sampling location significantly affects detection sensitivity and diversity representation in eDNA-based bivalve monitoring. Combined application of Center Mix and Center Surface strategies may enhance both detection efficiency and species diversity coverage in lentic environments.

목차
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
    1. Sampling points and sampling method
    2. eDNA concentration and extraction
    3. 1st PCR (amplification)
    4. Index PCR and informatics analysis
    5. Traditional individual-based sampling method
RESULT
    1. Unionid ASV diversity based on eDNA
    2. Diversity variation and optimal ednasampling points
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Supplementary data 1. Results of conventional benthic macroinvertebrate surveys in six lakes. The table shows the number of individualsrecorded for each species observed in each reservoir.
저자
  • Keonhee Kim(Human and Ecocare Center, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)
  • Hye-Ji Oh(Organization for the Promotion of Gender Equality, Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8271, Japan)
  • Yerim Choi(Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea)
  • Kwang-Hyeon Chang(Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea)
  • Junhee Kwon(Department of Biology Education, Kongju National University, Kongju 32588, Republic of Korea)
  • Min-Ho Jang(Department of Biology Education, Kongju National University, Kongju 32588, Republic of Korea) Corresponding author
  • Myungchul Kim(SOKN Institude of Ecology & Conservation, Yangpyeong 12563, Republic of Korea)
  • Mooseong Kim(Ministry of Environment, Sejong 30103, Republic of Korea)